building own library with include-files?

[mister_e]

Dwayne,

Look te thread Embedded string in your codespace. It use MPASM DA directive to define labels. For the EEPROM we will use DE instead with few modification to the previous Macro... well per the book. I should have a look to this too.. one day

It's interesting to set Labels to EEPROM when you use many Constants or Array OR if you just want to store Text String directly to the EEPROM and keep your codespace for what it's suppose to be, OR, ... OR, ... once again possibility are endless.

I suggest to everyone to read and study the MPASM book. Really usefull stuff. i have a feeling about the popularity of this reading but...

YES it use some assembler line, YES ASSEMBLER. But as i know, nobody died after using Assembler.

[Darrel Taylor]

For your inspection,

EEPROM Variables (EE_Vars.pbp)
http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=2444
<br>

[Dwayne]

Darrel,

Why don't you put a copy of this is in the FAQ section....
Good stuff on these Macro's...

Dwayne

[bot402]

To quote

"I do not like Delphi, because it is not as powerful as C/C++."

This has to be one of the most idiotic statements I've read on this forum for a long time.

Delphi is one of the most powerful languages that is available on the PC and in some cases far outways what can be done in C++ (it certainly produces smaller, faster code). Did you realise that a lot of Borland Builder C++ VCLs are written using the "inferior" Delphi language?

It's C and C++ that is the sloppy language compared to Pascal (Delphi). Pascal was first written as a training aid, to show how a correctly formatted and structured program should be written. And to teach some discipline while writing, as opposed to C and C++ which has been created by comittee over the years and now has so many flavours and versions that the portability aspect has virtually dissapeared, unless it is a small set of functions or procedures.

You've just insulted every Delphi user out there! even the professional programmers who use it to create programs that are simply staggering in their complexity.

[Dwayne]

Hello Bot402,

Dr>>"I do not like Delphi, because it is not as powerful as C/C++."

Bot>>This has to be one of the most idiotic statements I've read on this forum for a long time.<<

This is not a forum for fighting matches ;-}

Bot>>Delphi is one of the most powerful languages that is available on the PC and in some cases far outways what can be done in C++ (it certainly produces smaller, faster code). Did you realise that a lot of Borland Builder C++ VCLs are written using the "inferior" Delphi language? <<

I have programmed for 25 years... I have programmed in Delphi, C/C++, Pascal, Assembly, ADA, Basic, RPG, and a few others. I know what Delphi does, and I know what C/C++ does.

Bot>>It's C and C++ that is the sloppy language compared to Pascal (Delphi).<<

It is what some people call a sloppy language. Yes, I agree, but it is only sloppy, because it is up to the programmer and the programmers knowledge to control what the program is doing. As I said before, you can overwrite Memory space quite easily in C/C++... This can be a advantage on security issues as well as a disadvantage to those who are not able to write good code.


Bot>> Pascal was first written as a training aid, to show how a correctly formatted and structured program should be written.<<

Nothing new to me. I even have a few older versions of Pascal. I believe it is called Turbo Pascal 3 (the version I have), and maybe Turbopascal 5 before I stopped purchasing it. I liked Turbo C/C++ from Borland better, to each their own.

Bot>>You've just insulted every Delphi user out there! even the professional programmers who use it to create programs that are simply staggering in their complexity.<<

No, I Have not insulted every Delphi user out there. I have only stated facts... Dephi is great for its field, it is a much easier and MUCH more forgivng language than C/C++ is. Unless a person knows how to keep control of their memory, stacks, variables, and initializations, C/C++ is not going to be easy for them.


This issue has been a long time running issue between the C/C++ and Delphi folks for years. <g>. The only thing I say ... To each their own. You like Delphi, (which I like also, and own 2 versions of it, and if I want to use it, I can click on the yellow 3 piller delphi32 icon and use it). I like C/C++ with or without the Builder, and own 5 versions of it. Thus it is my more preferred language to work with.

I do like the way they integerated Delphi into the Builder though!...Thus Borlands Builder will accept Delphi's object code too, and compile it. (quite nice IMO). There are *more* Delphi Programmers than Bolands Builders C/C++ too. I think in time, they will be meshing Delphi and C/C++ Builder into one huge IDE/Progamming platform.

Dwayne

[Darrel Taylor]

Thanks Dwayne.

Why don't you put a copy of this is in the FAQ section....

Well, from the number of "I can't get my PIC to blink an LED", and "How do I set the config Fuses" posts we still get here, apparently, nobody reads them.

But, as long as this thread remains active, almost everyone will see it.<hr>

Now then, to reiterate my post prior to the BOT bursting into flames.

For your Perusal,

EEPROM Variables (EE_Vars.pbp)
http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=2444
<br>

[mister_e]

Thanks Dwayne too! BTW it seems to be the usual comment or post of this user. Few here remind something called Heated Debate

O.K i stop here...

Everybody go to the following link
http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=2444

Really awesome stuff from Darrel.