High priority/low priority program parts


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 21 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Selm, Germany
    Posts
    116


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: High priority/low priority program parts

    Hello mpgmike,

    you are totally right. Problem is: I already made the PCB for this double-PIC Project and it works halfways.
    If I had to begib new i would take your advice and get the 18F26k22. Maybe I got some liying around.
    I bought 18F45K... for a projekt Henrik supports me but this device is too big in pin-through case form. Its HUUUGE
    compared to a 18F1320 in SMD which I have.
    It took me days to develop the PCB and manufacture it and I think optimizing the program is way less work
    than starting new.Next thing is : I try the HSEROUT/HSERIN thingy and watch if the cycle gets faster.
    I don´t have as much leisure time as I would like to.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,612


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: High priority/low priority program parts

    HSERIN/HSEROUT won't make any difference on it's/their own.

    You need to look at the system level. Why is this code taking up to 300ms to execute? Because it sits here waiting for data for 300ms Before continuing (if no data arrives). So, the next question then is what is the F88 doing and how often does it actually SEND data?

    And again, think about implementing some handshaking or polling scheme.

    /Henrik.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Selm, Germany
    Posts
    116


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: High priority/low priority program parts

    hello Henrik,
    I thought HSERIN/HSEROUT would automatcally take care of the handshake. In the background.

    On the other hand i could put some more debug commands into the 16F88 code so that it has for example

    3 Debug commands between the main program lines. That should translate to 3 times sending the same which
    translates to less waiting of the 18F1320 to get what it wants.It doesn´t matter that this will slow down the 16F88, it has the slow task.

    Haha! Thats the total primitive method. I guess you will call it "Flintstone style programming".

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,612


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: High priority/low priority program parts

    No, HSERIN/HSEROUT does not do handshaking automatically, in the background.
    The UART in the PIC can receive one byte/character (and almost a second full byte/character) without the code doing anything but when that byte/character is received the code must fetch the byte from the receive buffer. This is where interrupts come in but you you were quite clear you didn't want to go that route - and frankly, it should not be needed for this.

    And again, using HSERIN with a WAIT statement in place of DEBUGIN will gain you pretty much nothing.

    Can you post the '88 code for us to take a look at, I'm sure you'll get plenty of suggestions on how to improve it.

    /Henrik.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Selm, Germany
    Posts
    116


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: High priority/low priority program parts

    Hello Henrik,
    thank you for your suggestion
    here:

    '************************************************* ***************
    '* Name : PUMP16F88V1 *
    '* Test with 20-23 °C RB0 = HPWM out *
    '* Author : M.David *
    '* Notice : Copyright (c) 2018 *
    '* : All Rights Reserved *
    '* Date : 01.01.2018 *
    '* Version : AB sensor M12x1,5 *
    '* Notes : 16F88 kein LCD funktioniert halbwegs *
    '* : PORTA.0 analog IN 0-2V channel 0 *
    '* PORTB.1 Fan out PPORTB.0 Water pump out *
    '************************************************* ***************

    #CONFIG
    __config _CONFIG1,_EXTCLK & _WDT_ON & _LVP_OFF & _CP_OFF
    #ENDCONFIG
    Define OSC 20
    TRISB = %00000000

    Define ADC_BITS 8 ' Set number of bits in result
    Define ADC_CLOCK 3 ' Set clock source (3=rc)
    Define ADC_SAMPLEUS 50 ' Set sampling time in uSec
    DEFINE DEBUG_REG PORTB
    DEFINE DEBUG_BIT 2
    DEFINE DEBUG_BAUD 19200
    DEFINE DEBUG_MODE 0
    DEFINE DEBUG_PACING 500

    define CCP1_REG PORTB 'für HPWM
    DEFINE CCP1_bit 0 'HPWM port B.0


    TRISA = %11111111 ' Set PORTA to all input
    ADCON1 = %00000010 ' Set PORTA analo
    CMCON = 7 ' Disable analog comparator
    ANSEL = %00000001 ' set AN0 (RA0) as analog, others to digital




    FAN VAR PORTB.1
    Uin VAR Word
    Temp Var word
    speed var word
    Pump var word
    RX var word
    RS var word
    B0 var word

    Speed = 0
    FAN = 0
    pause 1000
    DEBUG 10,13

    main:

    ADCIN 0,Uin ' Read channel 0 (RA)

    DEBUG "*.*",DEC3 RX,dec3 RS,dec1 FAN,13,10 ' dec3 is important
    DEBUG 10,13
    HPWM 1,speed,2442

    IF Uin => 64 then
    B0 = Uin/2
    Temp = 100-B0
    else
    Temp = 131 - Uin
    endif
    TEMP = Temp-5 ;Korrekturfaktor nach Kalibrierung Anzeige ok bei 75-90°C


    RX = TEMP
    RS = pump


    Select Case temp
    Case is < 67
    speed = 0
    pump = 0
    case 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
    speed = 8
    pump = 3
    case 73, 74
    speed = 16
    pump = 6
    case 75, 76
    speed = 32
    pump = 12
    case 77, 78
    speed = 64
    pump = 25
    case 79, 80
    speed = 124
    pump = 50
    case 81,82
    pump = 75
    Speed = 191
    case is > 80
    speed = 255
    pump = 100
    End Select

    IF (Temp <= 84 ) then
    FAN = 0
    else
    FAN = 1
    endif

    goto main

    END ' End of program

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Selm, Germany
    Posts
    116


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: High priority/low priority program parts

    Here three pics of that housing and so on:Name:  Pumpcontroller1.png
Views: 1202
Size:  735.0 KBName:  Pumpcontroller2.png
Views: 1190
Size:  700.4 KBName:  Pumpcontroller3.png
Views: 1206
Size:  762.8 KB

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Commerce Michigan USA
    Posts
    1,166


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: High priority/low priority program parts

    Mugelpower, I would also like to help so, if you could please explain the whole project overview. Contact me directly via, [email protected] or private email to this site. I have designed N.O.S. controllers for Bracket racers and timing equipment for National Drag Boat Association here in the US. I'm getting ready to retire from current job and need something to do with my spare time...... Been working with PBP for 20+ years.... BTW, I like the Billet housing...
    Dave Purola,
    N8NTA
    EN82fn

Similar Threads

  1. DT lOW PRIORITY INTERRUPTS - ASM WARNING
    By longpole001 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 6th September 2014, 00:56
  2. Programme Flow Priority ?
    By gunayburak in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 9th August 2014, 23:20
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 24th January 2014, 19:38
  4. Priority interrupt?
    By Qacer in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: - 6th October 2006, 16:47
  5. Can you give varied levels of priority to blocks of code?
    By Archangel in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: - 12th August 2006, 01:58

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts