First use of i2c from parallel output processing

[queenidog]

Attached is my proposal. One PIC driving 7 MCP23017 port expanders, driving 6-16 channel triac boards in a matrix (the seventh board is the matrix controller that controls what segment gets turned on and what color light). In other words I have to present the matrix code and the individual light code at the same time, like a logical AND circuit.

The "matrix controller" could be another i2c device, or it could just be 9 channels of DIO from the PIC, 6 channels for each segment of the star and 3 for the color, depending how easy it is to program the i2c version. I'm thinking of "repeated start" in the i2c code where a stop is not sent at the end of the string, but a start is instead. That way I can push the code to the MCP23017 simultaneously.

If I do the 9 channel DIO, then I can just put the i2c individual-light code into the same loop that defines what lights are going to light up. Make sense?

I envision it like this: 1) determine what segment to light, 2) determine what color, 3)enable those triacs and hold, 4)determine 16 bit light pattern to display, 5) transmit to I2C network. As soon as that happens of course, the lights should light. Then the code will jump to next routine.

The triac matrix is not a problem. I have that running now with straight DIO outputs from a PIC.

[queenidog]

I made a model, using mono-color LED, and I2C port expanders. Worked extremely well.
I then made a model using RGB LEDs, again with port expanders and wired in a matrix so I could turn on just the red, just the green, blue, or any other combination. Of 16 LEDS I could light up just one, in any color. Great. I'm on a roll.
I made a small "test bench" using SSRs and 110V incandescent bulbs, using the SSRs in a matrix (column and row). There was some leakage through bulbs that were not supposed to be on (not triggered by an SSR) but for the most part it was manageable. So I scaled it up to the proper size: 48 incandescent bulbs in RGB colors (16 of each) and fed by 16 SSRs. For the color I had 3 SSRs feeding a "color bus". Didn't work. So much leakage through the bulbs (they aren't like LEDs, diodes and one way current) that when I tried to light ONE bulb, I get all three colors active. This even though I might only activate the Red color bus for example. I'm hooped. Not sure what to do now.

[mpgmike]

Maybe add diodes so the bulbs work like LEDs?

[queenidog]

It's been a while since I was here 'cause I was really into getting the Arduino/AC matrix going. AC matrix with triacs or SSRs does not work. The matrix part works but there is too much leakage between the rows and columns of incandescent bulbs. I abandoned that project and now going to high intensity 3-10 W RGB LEDs. I currently have a model where I can light individual RGB LEDs in any fashion or color, through port expanders (MCP23017) and 3 DIO from an Arduino UNO. Well, I'm about to abandon the Arduino!! It's a great development tool if you can get through that absolutely horrid C++. I've been using it for 5 months now and it is a real PITA! Syntax will kill you, and the error reporting may as well not exist because the error message NEVER relates to the problem. I never had problems with PBP, using a LabX-1 from MELabs for development, then making my own MCU board. I'm going back that way. I'd like to thank all those that replied to my initial question which was kind of ..uh..stupid, now that I know I'm doing!! You guys have given me some good insight on how to get variables properly defined to make coding easier down the line. I have "stuff" running (16 LEDs each on 5 boards with a 16 channel port expander ) but to go further means more C++ thrashing. I spend more time fixing syntax than I do programming. I'm tired of it. Giving up. Going back to PIC and PBP.