DT_INTS for K42

[mpgmike]

Some of you guys blow my mind. I eagerly learn from your wealth of knowledge. In the past, modifying the DT_INTS was a simple matter of taking care of Interrupt PIE/PIR locations. At least on the MCUs I've worked with, so far so good. I will look at the data sheet and the DT_INTS-18 ASM to try to learn about what was mentioned in the previous 2 posts and see what I can learn. Thanks so much for your valuable input.

Richard, how were you able to test a PBP INCLUDE on a MCU not offered in PBP3.1? Are you already working with the new K42 using C18 or something, or did you test it in some simulation (like Proteus) package? I reference line 1, "the latest attachment is not working."

[richard]

Richard, how were you able to test a PBP INCLUDE on a MCU not offered in PBP3.1? Are you already working with the new K42 using C18 or something, or did you test it in some simulation (like Proteus) package?

sorry I have not tried these chips yet , they are unsupported by any compilers I use except xc8 which I'm avoiding
due to being fed up with mplabx machinations

I reference line 1, "the latest attachment is not working."

i'm refering to post3

Would love to delete the previous version. Here is the finished one.

that finished one is not viewable to me the attachment is faulty

[mpgmike]

DT_INTS-18_K42b.bas

Let me try again.