Me neither!
But I did catch the "Thank" part.
So in case that's what it was...
You're welcome zaferakbay.
Hope you get good use out of it.
<br>
Me neither!
But I did catch the "Thank" part.
So in case that's what it was...
You're welcome zaferakbay.
Hope you get good use out of it.
<br>
DT
Ok let's try in split words..
gerçekten = Actually, honestly,indeed, literrally, positively,properly,really,simply, truly
güzel = attractive beautiful, bonny, bracing, cherub,comely,dreamy,elegant,enjoyable,fair,fine,g allant,glorious,graceful,grand,handsome,lovely,nic e...
uygulama = application, execution,implementation,practice
teşekkür = *** can't be found *****
ediyorum = *** can't be found ****
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
hmmm,
positively glorious application
properly elegant implementation
honestly beautiful execution
really dreamy practice
Hey, works for me
As long as those last 2 words aren't
Stink, Pile or S___
<br>
DT
Not quite “teşekkür ediyorum”
teşekkür ederim = thank you
http://cali.arizona.edu/maxnet/tur/nalan1/foo00005.htm
WordReference.com Language Forums
"Teşekkür ederim" (= I thank you) is still widely used in Turkey
http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=252655
Language Forums, maybe we could post PICBasic in their forum and they could come looking for us!![]()
Ohm it's not just a good idea... it's the LAW !
Great. Thanks P.U.
Now that we know what he said, I can give a better reply ...
zaferakbay,
Rica ederim.
(You're Welcome)
<br>
DT
By the way, talking about the great piece of code. I am trying to make it work on a logarithmic scale, to measure audio levels from -40 to +6dbm (-40db=20mV, 0db=0,775V rms at 600 ohm and +6db=2V). As it can be seen it is a very large dynamic region.
For a few steps it's OK to do it with a lookdown, but if the display is 20 characters wide and with 3 bars each, total 60 steps, a table is slow. So a computational method is to be found.
Testing the suggestions of Tracy Allens at www.emesys.com. I do not fully understand what he is doing there though.
Any other ideas welcome.
Ioannis
Last edited by Ioannis; - 21st June 2007 at 09:09.
Hi Alain,
Cool, more examples.
I tried using all 5 bars when I wrote it, but was never happy with the results. There seemed to be pauses, jumping or something missing (depending on which way I tried to do it). All due to those darn spaces between the characters. Had the same problem trying Vertical Bars.
But I'll fire up your example and see if it looks any better.
If it works better, I'm going to hate myself for losing to a Basic Stamp program.
<br>
DT
Hi, Ioannis
I just wrote a 255 values lookup table ( convert a LOG pot to lin response ) ...
for Malc-c electric train control.
did not take more than 3 minutes to load it ...
I use a small old Casio FX-880P personnal Computer ... programmed in BASIC ... WOW !!!
You also can use a GWBasic little program on your computer ( on the W98 CD Goldies ...)
Other solution is to create an Excel application writing in a window the LOOKUP values, separated by their commas ... and just paste it into the editor.
like this one :
http://www.electronic-engineering.ch...generator.html
The third solution is to create a "Lookup file" with Excel ... and INCLUDE it at the place pointed at by PbP ...
You'll discover here PbP really wastes a lot of room ... ( no, no ...Darrel, not on the head ... )
much,much better ( and really simple ) to write it in assembler !!! ( if you need an ASM example ... no Pb !!! )
Regards
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
Bookmarks