Hot tub temp control

[HenrikOlsson]

Not sure what you mean by standard 1k pulse stream but again, as long as your PWM period is MUCH MUCH longer than a half cycle you shold be fine. With SSD I'd go for 10 seconds or something, with a mechincal relay 1 minute but it obviously depends on how much the heater is able to "move" the temperature in that timeframe (which isn't much I'd guess) - as you say.

[MOUNTAIN747]

Not sure what you mean, MUCH MUCH longer than a half cycle. You mean the period being the time for the full on and off portion of a single cycle? Why is it important for the pulse to be longer than a half cycle? Does it have to do with the time needed to turn on the SSR? Looking at your illustration it would seem that any positive going pulse would turn on the SSR for the completion of that cycle? Or, am I making this more complicated than it is? So why would you switch on the SSD for only 10 seconds? Why not much longer? Water temp is not going to move very fast at 220V&18.5Amps Lets say 250 gallon tank . I’m sure I’ve missed the point. Please explain.

Wayne

[Amoque]

I don't think you need PID or PWM, just a thermometer and a relay should do fine I would think.

If it takes one minute to heat the tub one degree, and it cools at the same rate, then you may keep the temperature of the water between... say, 77 and 78 degrees (any two arbitrary points, really) by turning the element on for one minute every other minute. I suppose you might want it to take two minutes to heat the water or you might want to keep the water within a half a degree of optimum, but it will be rare to find a thermostat accurate and consistent enough that a 10 second or so cycle won't keep the water very close to optimum temperature - and this only if it takes only 1 minute to heat or cool the tank a degree. If it requires 10 minutes, or 30, then turning on and off the element in 10 or 30 second cycles should keep very close temperature control.

My guess is that you will need far more watts to get anywhere near a rate of increase that requires PID or PWM and, if I'm wrong and the water does heat too quickly, you could use a lower wattage element.

I don't often take baths, but even in that small tank I am comfortable for at least tens of minutes with no auxiliary heating, but then... perhaps lavender scented bubbles retain heat?!

[HenrikOlsson]

Not sure what you mean, MUCH MUCH longer than a half cycle.

I mean MUCH MUCH longer than a half cylce of the AC. As I tried to explain and illustrate in the other thread, if you run a 1kHz PWM signal with a 50% dutycycle into an SSR it will basically be conducting 100% of the time - not 50% as the PWM signal dictates. If, however, the PWM period would be, say 1000 times longer than the period of the AC half cycle it doesn't matter much WHERE in the AC half cycle that falling edge of the PWM signal occurs (remember that the SSR will keep conducting untill the AC zero crossing), the error will be very small.

Why is it important for the pulse to be longer than a half cycle?

Not the pulse, the period of the PWM signal.

Looking at your illustration it would seem that any positive going pulse would turn on the SSR for the completion of that cycle?

First of all, there are different types of SSR, the illustration asumes a random firing one. Yes, a pulse will turn ON the SSR which will then conduct "on it's own" until the next zero crossing.

So why would you switch on the SSD for only 10 seconds? Why not much longer?

I didn't say that. I said that the period of the PWM signal could be 10 seconds. The output of the PID routine then tells the PWM generator how much of that period the heater will be powered. If the PID determines it needs 100% power then the SSR will be on continously. If the PID determines it needs 25% power the heater will be on for 2.5seconds and off for 7.5seconds. Now, even if the falling edge of the PWM signal occurs right after the AC zero crossing the SSR will only conduct for the remaining of the half cycle (8.333ms at 60Hz mains) which is a very small proportion of the desired 2.5 seconds. But you can easily use a longer period as well if you want.

Or, as Amoque says, use a simple on/off thermostat.

/Henrik.

[Dave]

There is NO NEED to use PWM for such a slow cycle time. I use 5 seconds for the cycle time in my Sous Vide controller and it yields .05 degree control. I only use the timer and have 299.999 bits resolution for the seudo pwm which is 16.666 milliseconds.

[HenrikOlsson]

But it's STILL a PWM signal, right? It's just that the frequency (ie the PWM period) is a lot longer than what you normally can generate with the CCP module of the PIC.

[MOUNTAIN747]

Thanks guys for all the input. I think Amoque has a point which is supported by Dave. I’m not worried about controlling power for any AC cycle but controlling the on-off function of the SSR for say an on cycle of 5 seconds or 5 minutes so I use a pulse stream like Henrik displays in his illustration for 5 sec. or 5 minutes. After which I monitor the temp change. I’m sure a relay would do the job just fine except I don’t want to have to replace a relay every other year. I’m sure it will take some experimenting to get the on-off times worked out depending on the volume of the water. A PID is most likely overkill. I see now there are many ways to control this function. Thanks again, you guys are awesome.
Wayne

[Amoque]

But it's STILL a PWM signal, right? It's just that the frequency (ie the PWM period) is a lot longer than what you normally can generate with the CCP module of the PIC.

I suppose it is... But, I would more typically describe PWM as a means of limiting apparent output to a percentage of fully on. As an example, with an LED: If the modulation is fast enough that the LED appears less than 100% bright it would be (in my mind) PWM; if the modulation was slow enough that the LED appeared full output, I would call that "blinking". I'm sure that there are a dozen issues with my definition/ description, but its what first comes to mind as how I'd differentiate.