Why not consider ISO-9141 single wire half duplex at that slow baud rate.
Why not consider ISO-9141 single wire half duplex at that slow baud rate.
Dave Purola,
N8NTA
EN82fn
tumbleweed
Maybe the ADM4850 115 kbps chip is a better choice for me then.
http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1581181.pdf
That one should work fine.
As Henrik pointed out the CAT5 cable is 100 ohm. You can always change the terminations to 100 instead of 120 ohms to better match the cable (the ADM4850 can drive 50 ohms) but with the slower slew rates I doubt you'll notice much of a difference.
I'd start with the higher value and see how it works out... less power that way.
Thanks for all the answers, I will order some parts now and start testing.![]()
At 2400 baud, and one-way comms, I would even try without the RS-485/422 driver, simply modulating the signal with a transistor (or a pair, to retain the polarity) at the transmitter end, at perhaps 15 volts or so; at the receiving end, just use a voltage divider to get a 5 volt signal back.
Bookmarks