Battery monitoring - ever tried AN1072?


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 57

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,172


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Battery monitoring - ever tried AN1072?

    That was an example with the cap.

    You SHOULD add the transistor!. Just use cap for more stable reading when R's are higher and have more time waitng for sampling. Also you do nothave to keep the divider active all the time, just for the few ms to read the AD valu. Then switch it off.

    Ioannis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    SWITZERLAND (french speaking)
    Posts
    952


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Battery monitoring - ever tried AN1072?

    Thanks Ioannis but what about the load?
    Roger

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,172


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Battery monitoring - ever tried AN1072?

    What load? I did not understood that.

    Ioannis

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    409


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Battery monitoring - ever tried AN1072?

    Honestly, you are coming up against traditional design tradeoffs. To be able to measure the battery reserve, how much battery capacity are you willing to burn vs cost of the circuit? Using just 2 high value resistors without the transistor can be almost as efficient as having the transistor in there when you consider leakage currents if the values are high enough, and simplify the circuit, simplify the software, and cost a few pennies less. The problem is that the input impedance of the pin could load the resistor divider if the values get too high, and of course the high values add a susceptibility to electrical noise. The cap helps with removing noise, and prevents the load caused by sampling to impact the result if the reading is taken fairly quickly compared to the time constant of the RC product. If you don't care about cost and a relatively minor increase in complexity, then use lower value resistors to make the parasitics less of an issue, and use the transistor to switch on the circuit. If you are not comfortable with analog design, then the transistor simplifies the math.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,172


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Battery monitoring - ever tried AN1072?

    Roger, do follow post #19 and just add a capacitor in parallel to the 560 resistor. A 1uF would be just fine. Or bigger if you have one.

    This will give consistent AD values.

    Thats all.

    Ioannis

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    SWITZERLAND (french speaking)
    Posts
    952


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Battery monitoring - ever tried AN1072?

    Received loud and clear
    Roger

Similar Threads

  1. Battery voltage monitoring for use on 16F1825
    By longpole001 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: - 23rd April 2013, 15:57
  2. Replies: 13
    Last Post: - 22nd January 2012, 05:48
  3. ADCIN car battery monitoring
    By mitchf14 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: - 29th June 2008, 09:04
  4. 12v car battery monitoring
    By oldcarguy85 in forum Schematics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 10th December 2007, 01:26
  5. Using the A/D for Monitoring a Solor Cell and Battery
    By chuck.sieveking in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: - 13th July 2004, 20:27

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts