A tft addin for pbp3

[visnja30]

I tried to test the repetitively button, it works but not as expected.

When I touch the button the counter starts counting, and its value increases every 300ms for one and then suddenly accelerate and in few mS in increase his value very quikly and then slow down.

If it happens to someone else or just me?

[richard]

Why you have selected BS250

because it comes in a t092 package I can use in a breadboard for testing , yes a IRLML9301TRPbF would probably be better but they only come in a sot23 package.

visnja30 repetitively button, it works but not as expected

I would need to see your code to be sure ,button auto repeat works for me just fine . auto repeat won't begin until long_press_threshold has been reached and will repeat @ repeat_press_rate

these constants in the TOUCH_TFT.PBPMOD file control button timing . they may need adjusting depending on OSC and "gosub CK_BUTTON " loop rate

repeat_press_rate con 100 ;button auto repeat rate (must be less than long_press_threshold)
long_press_threshold con 300 ; min time for a BUTTON long press result
short_press_threshold con 20 ; min time for a BUTTON pressed result

[richard]

I put a bug in the CK_BUTTON: subroutine in the TOUCH_TFT.PBPMOD file , it stops a long_press being detected


should be this

IF button_count[the_button] >= long_press_threshold THEN

instead of

IF button_count[the_button] > long_press_threshold THEN

I will post a amended version when I finish getting the >64k code location problem solved for strings

[richard]

some updates

CK_BUTTON: subroutine in the TOUCH_TFT.PBPMOD file fixed
const txt strings can now be anywhere in addressable pgm memory
button txt strings can now be anywhere in addressable pgm memory


pin definitions for tft dc/cs/rst have been simplified
eg. for tft cs on bit 5 instead of tft_cs_bit con 32 is now

tft_cs_bit  con 5

[richard]

some changes to the touch add in
now ready for 16 buttons ,makebutton is optimised a bit better, bank 0 dependency relaxed

[richard]

finally worked out why fillcircle was so slooooow
a much faster solution

[visnja30]

I include file flash_spi.pbpmod there is two labels with the same name FL_IMG: is it OK or one labels is too much?