Heated Debate... Features and Updates and Things...

[NavMicroSystems]

Do we really need this kind of thread


? ? ? ? ? ?

I guess we don't.

For those who are interrested:
have you clicked on links in the signatures of this thread and tried to navigate on those sites?
(just try it and see what I mean)

Assuming the products are as good as the website:
I don't have any further questions.

[Demon]

Sorry Ralph, you're right, we don't. But I didn't start the thread and I hate seeing someone fling mud with impunity. As for the missing posts, it's obvious trimming has been done. I replied only on the still-present posts from Tim.

"The fact that a number of you want to just sit back and accept the status quo on the pretence that "well yes it does produce bloat code and yes it is limited in functionality and yes I have to do loads of work a rounds to do the basic stuff "all on the pretence “well it is 100% bug free” is insult to the rest of the users. Look at the latest releases it say’s fixed…. fixed… even after all these years."

That is bashing PBP, and I think he's wrong to do it.

"You have accused me of coming on this forum trying to persuade people to buy this other compiler. What other compiler I make a very important point about not mentioning names."

I never accused him of trying to 'steal customers'. The fact he is not naming names like he's done in the past (something I had no idea about since I wasn't here), is irrelevant.

Tim misinforms and I think that is not right. MeLabs is in no obligation to keep the public informed on anything, just like every other business. Disclosing upcoming releases also reveals important information to competition. He exaggerates when in fact the way MeLabs operates is the norm in big business. MeLabs is free to evolve at the rate it wishes. In the end, it's the customers that will decide if it is adequate or not.

The fact that he has close ties to 'the competition' and bashes PBP is totally out of line and I believe he should be called out on it. Ralph, you, Melanie, Steve and the other longtimers will read between the lines and know 'exactly' who Oximbit is and what he is doing. From the standpoint of a newcomer, he looks like someone with a hidden agenda, doing his best to put down a product, without posting anything productive in this forum (referring to the Oximbit ID).

Also, I never said Bot was another alias, I was referring to the Tim alias in the other forums. As for my comment about removing Bot, well this is a wishlist forum but apparently I should have added a sarcasm-o-meter.

Robert

[Demon]

"For those who are interrested:
have you clicked on links in the signatures of this thread and tried to navigate on those sites?
(just try it and see what I mean)"

Sorry Ralph, I see no signatures?

I do see a little avatar, like your Einstein-thingy, but that's it.

Robert

[NavMicroSystems]

Sorry Ralph, I see no signatures?

I do see a little avatar, like your Einstein-thingy, but that's it.

Robert

I meant the signatures on other posts ;-)

[Demon]

D'oh... :lol:

I still believe he was wrong to bash PBP here.

Robert

[NavMicroSystems]

D'oh... :lol:

I still believe he was wrong to bash PBP here.

Robert

No Comment!

[Demon]

Ralph, he only signed his 1st post. That was not the one that really caught my eye, it was the other ones where he bashed PBP and boasted about 'his compiler'.

I still stand by what I said, 'you do not poop on competition'.

Robert