Hello Alain,

Alain:
I'm a pure Hobbyist ... who flies models.

You will surely agree reliability is the first thing I'm waiting from PBP ...

I can say, I never had bad surprises ( exept my own beginner's errors ...) with PBP.
It's really a great tool ... and I can enhance or modify it myself !!!

But I agree it needs a little (really little ! ) learning time, that's a good thing nowadays to learn, instead of stupidly paste already done work ...

No other compiler offers that ...
I used to fly models for 20 some years. Was on a show team that opened up the airshows here in Wichita. Flew competition in Pattern flying. I am also a GA pilot and a UL Pilot. My favorite engine was a Rossi 40 or a YS 45. 2HP for a .40 engine... and wow did they scream! Used a Rossi 60 for ducted fan model. But 12 ounces of fuel would go in 5 min with the .40!


I have found PBP 100 percent reliable. Tough, small code, and easy to use. Every once In a while, I will get stumped. But it is usually my fault. Just like all compilers, you have to use them to know them. And when I get stumped, it is usually because I have not used that feature yet, or tried to shortcut by not looking in the manual...<g>

Dwayne