I'll bet that even if you own PBP3 and a 18F series chip, the code Henrik posted, will be using less memory and will be much faster than using Long variables.
Ioannis
I'll bet that even if you own PBP3 and a 18F series chip, the code Henrik posted, will be using less memory and will be much faster than using Long variables.
Ioannis
Thanks for the feedback Fredrick!
Just a note, you don't need PBP3 to use LONGs, support for that were added in v2.5.
You do need an 18F part though. But, as Ioannis said, for a simple counter like that it's probably not worth the "cost" having them enabled.
/Henrik.
It does work for display, I did 15 digit numbers with a 16F628 the same way it was done on paper in school
with allowance for 16 digit result for a character LCD
Just a shame if you wanted the result in a variable, but you could probably write a good & proper calculator.
Code:123456789012345 * 012345678901234 _______________ _______________
Bookmarks