Future PBP

Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Future PBP

Threaded View

  1. - 17th January 2015, 09:40 #9
    Ioannis's Avatar
    Ioannis
    Ioannis is offline SuperMod
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,133

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Future PBP

    Quote Originally Posted by rmteo View Post
    there are things such as STM32CubeMX.
    that goes with C and as Dave said earlier, some really hate that syntax. At least frustrating for me. PBP fits perfectly to my taste, the speed I test my prototypes is remarkable comparing to C and the IDE I use (Microcode Studio) is really great in its simplicity.

    Many people, many preferences, but cannot deny that there are limitations that some day are too much. For example, I made an remote receiver using keeloq decoder in firmware and in PBP is on the limit. With C the same hardware performes much better using same resources (timers, interrupts etc).

    Charles, are you listening? People are waiting (long enough) for the good news.

    Ioannis
    Last edited by Ioannis; - 17th January 2015 at 09:43.
    www.signalcom.gr
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. Variables name in PBP and same variables name in ASM or macro listed in pbp xxx.lib
    By asegui in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 12th November 2014, 07:57
  2. The Future Of Hobby Electronics.
    By T.Jackson in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: - 2nd February 2009, 06:39
  3. PBP File Extension: .BAS vs .PBP
    By nedtron in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 13th February 2006, 05:48

Members who have read this thread : 5

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules