Future PBP


Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Future PBP

Threaded View

  1. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Future PBP

    Quote Originally Posted by rmteo View Post
    As you said "when an STM32F415 costs the same as a PIC18Fxxxx" why even bother.
    Somedays I couldn't agree more, but at the moment, abstraction and familiarity. I'm sure in a few years, that'll likely change completely. Familiar with PICs, know them inside and out, and I'm satisfied with the level of abstraction that PBP provides (basically the lack of the real need to know the guts), and yet can dig deep into the PICs guts when needed. Also at the moment, not very familiar with ARM, specifically the STM32F4 series, and with that, the IDEs available for the ARMs (Arduino styles/knockoffs not included) don't provide the abstraction wanted to easily kick something up quickly. Not to mention, there aren't a lot of ARMs in DIP packages. Yes, they're out there, just not a lot.

    Main point being...3 years and no updates? WTF?

    Double-dog dare anybody to find any one useful thread regarding 'updates' or a 'next version' with any meaningful information other than vapor ware.

    As for me, I'm modifying PBP to include a couple of newer choice smaller PICs as well as couple of the larger ones.
    Last edited by Demon; - 19th January 2015 at 05:48.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 12th November 2014, 08:57
  2. The Future Of Hobby Electronics.
    By T.Jackson in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: - 2nd February 2009, 07:39
  3. PBP File Extension: .BAS vs .PBP
    By nedtron in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 13th February 2006, 06:48

Members who have read this thread : 2

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts