when 128k is not enough


Results 1 to 40 of 82

Threaded View

  1. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    PERTH AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    838


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: when 128k is not enough

    thanks for that ,
    i been trolling the microchip site and this has been asked before using c , with various results , 2 threads i read eventualy gave it up.

    16bit mode would be the only option to consider , and i have a raised a ticket with microchip to pin down timing on the 16bit option for the bus , but the timing you mention seems likely ( microchip also give an example - in C of setup for the addressing , but it was not of much help

    but the underline factor is the speed drop of the cpu the 25mhz- or even say 32mhz to allow for the extended memory bus and that not really an option for this project. 64Mhz it works well and i really cant drop it back now , just running out of code space


    so again its looks like either is porting the code/ learning new compiler / c probablyor Microbasic maybe but i dont hear good things so far / new hardware chips / probalby go ARM

    OR

    having 2 cpus / split off some of the hardware / then develop and complete interface for the cpus with interupt handing / some varable transfering / sub routines indexing interface so the one cpu can call each others routines and what at this point looks like a lot of duplicated code in both cpus and work

    but it seems is the only way forward with PBP .

    the code has taken most of this year to write / test , and even though porting would be alot easier than starting again , i really dont want to , it would take another 3-4 months to learn new script language and then port everything

    EMB option looks so good an option over the above options if PBP can be made to use it well , but droping the cpu speed down to use the EMB is not really an option ,


    this really sucks some days

    cheers

    Sheldon
    Attached Files Attached Files

Similar Threads

  1. Saving space - close to 128k
    By longpole001 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: - 26th October 2014, 06:16
  2. writecode at upper half of 128K parts?
    By Tomasm in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 22nd November 2004, 19:02

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts