Error 115 - Duplicate label


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sc*nthorpe, UK
    Posts
    333


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    #define OSC 4 is the error

    should it be

    DEFINE OSC 4?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    24


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    Actually thats not what I have in my project so I must have copied and pasted the wrong code, though the rest of the lines are the same. I tried changing my code to what I posted and it compiles and runs OK (if I have the line commented out as noted in my original post) and I've just checked in the PBP3 manual and that syntax is allowed, like the #config

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sc*nthorpe, UK
    Posts
    333


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    Just trying to help. No need to get upset.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,612


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    Hi,
    I tried to compile the code, specifically:
    Code:
    #CONFIG
      __config _CONFIG1, _FOSC_INTOSC & _WDTE_OFF & _MCLRE_ON & _CP_OFF & _CLKOUTEN_OFF & _PWRTE_OFF & _BOREN_OFF
      __config _CONFIG2, _LVP_OFF & _LPBOR_OFF
    #ENDCONFIG
    
    #define OSC 4
    
    OSCCON=%01101000 ' 4MHz internal
    TRISC=0
    PORTC=0
    LED0 var PORTC.0
    
    Start:
    LED0=1
    Pause 500
    LED0=0
    Pause 500
    Goto Start
    And it compiles and assembles for the 16F1509 without any error messages or warnings using PBPX 3.0.7.4 and MPASM 5.45.
    What version of MPASM are you using?

    As for the DEFINE vs #DEFINE.... Yes both are valid but different and in this case you DO want DEFINE OSC 4 - without the # - but it's not related to the error message you get.
    See section 2.3.3 (DEFINEs defined) as well as section 4.10 (#DEFINE) in the manual.

    /Henrik.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    24


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    Quote Originally Posted by HenrikOlsson View Post
    Hi,
    I tried to compile the code, specifically:

    And it compiles and assembles for the 16F1509 without any error messages or warnings using PBPX 3.0.7.4 and MPASM 5.45.
    What version of MPASM are you using?

    /Henrik.
    I have MPSAM 5.56 in the Microchip install folder, but I also have 5.37 installed in another folder completely outside the Microchip install folder. I'm running MPLAB X 2.10 and I also have a copy of MPLAB 8.92 installed. I have removed MPSAM 5.37 from the tool list in MPLAB X but still same error. My PBP3 is version 3.07 (I downloaded the trial) Would you mind looking at your PIC16F1509.PBPINC file, line 41 and advise if it reads as
    #define SPBRG SPBRGL
    If it does, then I guess I have some version conflict which I need to sort out (perhaps it is time to reinstall fresh). Thanks, Chris

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,612


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    Hi,
    Yes, line 41 of my PIC16F1509.PBPINC reads exatly like that.

    Yeah, there's probably some sort of conflict between the definitions in the PBP inc file and MPASM inc file. Since the #header block is passed directly to the assembler I'm guessing that the ASM inc file ALSO includes a line defining ("aliasing") SPBRG as SPBRGL - but that's just a guess.

    If you're actually USING MPLABX as your IDE then I'm not the right guy to help you (never got it working). If you're not using it (or don't feel you HAVE to use it) I recommend you download and install the full package (including MPLAB 8.90) available from Melabs download page and use MicroCodeStudio as the IDE.

    /Henrik.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    24


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    Thanks Henrik, I was thinking along those lines as I felt that it looked like it was trying to define it's self in a sense, but I really don't have enough knowledge to be sure, hence the reason I was asking! I have the full package, I'll try installing that. I use to use MCS but I lost the key and the crowd that makes it wasn't interested in helping me retrieve it so I gave up on that (I got a new computer or the hard drive fell over or some such, was a few years ago) and I didn't feel inclined to pay a second time. Using the free version - well, that really did upset me, so I turfed it out LOL Thanks for your help
    Last edited by ChrisKiwi; - 10th June 2014 at 21:53. Reason: spelling

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    24


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    Quote Originally Posted by HenrikOlsson View Post
    Yeah, there's probably some sort of conflict between the definitions in the PBP inc file and MPASM inc file. Since the #header block is passed directly to the assembler I'm guessing that the ASM inc file ALSO includes a line defining ("aliasing") SPBRG as SPBRGL - but that's just a guess.
    /Henrik.
    Your comments got me thinking further so I downloaded the "Full" version of PBP3 and installed MPLAB 8.9 and got my code to compile and run with out commenting out the line in the PBPINC file. I compared the Microchip INC files and found that MPSAM 5.49 that installed from the full PBP3 download only had entries for SPBRGL and SPBRGH while MPASM 5.56 (Installed with MPLAB-X) had SPBRG (the offending one) SPBRGL and SPBRGH. The data sheet for the pic refers to SPBRGL and SPBRGH as 2 8 bit registers but refers to SPBRG as the combined value of the 2 registers. In the MPASM 5.56 inc file (MPLAB-X) SPBRG and SPBRGL have the same address, so in effect that is saying that SPBRG abd SPBRGL are the same thing, thus, you are defining the same thing twice or in different places (as per the error message) when you are using MPLAX-X with MPASM 5.56 and PBP3 but not when you are using the older version of MPLAB with MPASM 5.49 and PBP3. My solution is to comment out the line out in the PBP3 .PBPINC file on the basis that I think PBP3 should be compatible to MPASM, rather than the other way round. I wonder if this could be considered a "bug" ? - which came first - the chicken or the egg? Chris

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    24


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    I wasn't upset and I appreciate the fact you replied with a suggestion. The error was mine, in that I posted code from the wrong window, but from your response, we have both discovered something new about PBP3 - so I guess we are both winners

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sc*nthorpe, UK
    Posts
    333


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: Error 115 - Duplicate label

    The only reason I come here is to learn, as most people do. Whether what I learn will be of any use or not is debatable. For me it just needs to be interesting.

Similar Threads

  1. Duplicate label error
    By lilimike in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: - 21st December 2011, 00:07
  2. Compile error & syntax error on the word "loop:" as a label?
    By jellis00 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 7th March 2010, 04:14
  3. Hserin / Herout 115+ K Baud
    By rlmack35 in forum Serial
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 27th December 2008, 00:07
  4. Error[115]...duplicate label..."debug"
    By Brian J Walsh in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 8th April 2008, 09:29
  5. Is there a label restriction
    By jblackann in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: - 8th December 2006, 16:34

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts