I'm curious why you would want to slow the PIC to 48 kHz. What requirement prevents you from running at 4 MHz?
It might be easier to run everything at 4 MHz and tweak whatever specific logic you want to simulate 48 kHz.
Robert
I'm curious why you would want to slow the PIC to 48 kHz. What requirement prevents you from running at 4 MHz?
It might be easier to run everything at 4 MHz and tweak whatever specific logic you want to simulate 48 kHz.
Robert
Battery conservation, perhaps?
Yes…. Am attempting to use a pic in field from solar sources… so saving power is a premium !!!
"No one is completely worthless. They can always serve as a bad example."
Anonymous
Not interrupts but SLEEP or NAP. Interrupts keep the clock running but with SLEEP and NAP it all shuts down for a selectable period of time, wakes up, does its thing and goes back to sleep.
The data sheet I saw said 1uA at 3.3V so you may get down that low if you work at it.
It also looks like this chip has LED driver pins. Maybe you should look at a different chip for your more specific needs.
Bookmarks