How to write port names into array ?

[CuriousOne]

So I wrote it in this way, but it does not works:

AC VAR BIT[5]
AR VAR BIT[7]


AC[5]=PORTC.5
AC[4]=PORTC.4
AC[3]=PORTB.3 
AC[2]=PORTB.1
AC[1]=PORTB.5 

AR[1]=PORTB.6
AR[2]=PORTC.7
AR[3]=PORTB.2 
AR[4]=PORTB.0 
AR[5]=PORTB.4 
AR[6]=PORTB.7
AR[7]=PORTC.6 

'make all leds connected to ports on.

low ac[1]
low ac[2]
low ac[3]
low ac[4]
low ac[5]
high ar[1]
high ar[2]
high ar[3]
high ar[4]
high ar[5]
high ar[6]
high ar[7]

'but it does not works
'but it works with code below
low PORTB.3
HIGH PORTC.7



end

[HenrikOlsson]

Hi
It doesn't work that way, it won't work that way and it can't work that way.

When you do AR VAR BIT[7] you are reserving space in RAM for 7 consecutive bits. You can't them simultanously mirror each bit in RAM to a ANOTHER adress (which the ports are) - it won't and can't work.

Aliases must all point to the SAME location, like

AR VAR BIT[7] 
myBit VAR AR[2]

In the above case AR[2] and myBit are the one and same memory location, ie. two names for the same location, you can't do it the other way around. Ie you can't have one name for two locations which is basically what you're trying to do.

When you do

AR VAR BIT[7]

AR[1]=PORTB.6

You are reading the state of PORTB.6 and store the result of that in AR[1].

The only way I know of that is similar to what you're trying is to use a port offsets and a lookup table.

/Henrik.

[CuriousOne]

So,

PORTB.6=AR[1] won't work?

[HenrikOlsson]

Hi,
Well, yes, it'll work.
It'll set the state of PortB.6 to what is stored in AR[1], either 1 or 0 at the time that the instruction executes.
What it will NOT do is create a "mirror" where the state of PortB.6 automatically changes whenever AR[1] changes - which I suspect is what you're looking for.

/Henrik.

[CuriousOne]

well,

say I can have

ledpin1 var PORTB.1

then when I issue

high ledpin1

it will make ledpin1 high, right?

so why I can't have array member aliased as port, so when I'll issue

high array[1]

since this previously was set to as alias of portb.1

portb.1 become high?

More simple.

I can have port name aliased to variable, and then I can change the value of variable and this change will change port state, too.

So, I can't have port name aliased to array variable?

[HenrikOlsson]

Hi,

well,
say I can have
ledpin1 var PORTB.1
then when I issue
high ledpin1
it will make ledpin1 high, right?

Yes, that's correct, it'll make PortB.1 high because "all" you've done is assigned the "name" or "identifier" ledpin1 to bit 1 of the register PortB. So when you do HIGH ledpin1 it'll "translate" to HIGH PortB.1 - see, ledpin1 and PortB.1 are one and the same.

so why I can't have array member aliased as port, so when I'll issue
high array[1]
since this previously was set to as alias of portb.1
portb.1 become high?

Beacuse PortB.1 is at one location in the memory map and Array[1] is at another - they are not one and the same.
When you create an array you are actually allocating space in RAM for that array as opposed to the previous example where you simply assigned a different "name" to an already existing register. Array[1] and PortB.1 are two different locations.

If you're example would work then one should be able to do
PortB VAR PortA
PortC VAR PortB
PortD VAR PortC
PortA = 0
and expect all ports to clear - it doesn't work that way because PortA is not the same register as PortB just as Array[1] not the same PortB.1 - they are two different things. On the other hand
myPort VAR PortA
myPort = 0
Will clear PortA because all you've done is to create an alternative name or identifier for an already existing register.

You can have multiple names for a single location.
You can not have one name for multiple location.

Does that make sense?

/Henrik.

[CuriousOne]

Ok, I understood the limitations. But why they are present here, and aren't present elsewhere?

[CuriousOne]

Quite interesting, why it can't ?

The code example with LET & DIM is from Sinclair Basic, written in 1982 and running on Z80. It can handle such things, and picbasic pro - can't ?