Nah, I don't think those are suitable, they look more like differential analog drivers - not really what you want.
I was thinking more on line of a DS9638 on the master and a DS9637 (or similar devices) on each of the slaves:
/Henrik.
Nah, I don't think those are suitable, they look more like differential analog drivers - not really what you want.
I was thinking more on line of a DS9638 on the master and a DS9637 (or similar devices) on each of the slaves:
/Henrik.
Terribly sorry. I assumed most digital pots CS line requirements would be the same. The question wasn't about power supply it was about control and I again assumed that any pot chip would work about the same. Obviously bad assumptions on my part though I assumed a worst case scenario and replied on that.
I stated I wasn't an engineer and had no experience but I assumed a shield on the CS line and if necessary the power supply lines. He could also use a twisted pair on the power supply which should reduce noise collection.
I again assumed that a small conductor cable wouldn't create a great capacitor and with the slowish switching speed I assumed that wouldn't be a problem.
So now I've been straightened out and I apologize for leading anyone astray. Please let us know how you proceed and more importantly, your solution.
Dont worry about it.
I'm going to try the drivers and will be using standard cat5 cable and connectors. Makes things really easy.
Just a thought, connect a 1K resistor to the output of each receiver and connect the other end of the resistor to the base of a 3904 transistor, I think I should be able to turn on an LED each time the line goes high without loading it. It would be really nice to have a simple led showing activity on the data lines at each light, as a cable and connector diagnostic.
Bookmarks