Another bug: "clean up project folder" does not works. While it says "files were deleted", actually, no file being deleted. Also GLCD font creator can't save the file. It says it saved, but no file being saved.
Another bug: "clean up project folder" does not works. While it says "files were deleted", actually, no file being deleted. Also GLCD font creator can't save the file. It says it saved, but no file being saved.
Hi, Curious one
Here is not the place to complain about another product you have difficulties with ...
I saw You were on MkB forum @ 10.15 ( French hour ... ), so you were on the right place THERE to complain .
Your posts there show once more you didn't had opened neither the Pic Datasheet nor the IDE Manual or Help file ...
Once more it's no use to complain your IDE doesn't work by itself ... just make the effort to learn your lesson !!!
said gently ... this kind of thread has NO INTEREST for PicBasicPro Forumers ... as the fault is totally yours.
Learn your lessons and you will be allowed to criticize AFTER lesson learned
Alain
Last edited by Acetronics2; - 1st March 2013 at 10:26.
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
I believe, it's my duty, to warn others about the bad product, being falsely advertised as good one.
And the errors I've listed above, has nothing to do with my knowledge of MCUs. It's totally fault of that IDE developers.
At the same time, I'm checking picbasic pro. And also, this IDE seems to be written upside down. Why no ability to configure default path for output .hex files? There are couple of other bugs, too. I'll list them later.
If you feel most things are upside down then you probably live on the Southern hemisphere.
Here's my first code with picbasic pro up and running. It does output variable PWM which I use for led dimming.
Sure, code is written really bad, but, at least it works. I've used included BUTX3 sample as basis:
I believe, first two lines of code are irrelevant for PIC16F628A, but at least it works...Code:CMCON = 7 ' PORTA to digital OPTION_REG = $7f ' Enable PORTB pull-ups TRISB = %11001111 ' Set PORTB.4,5 (LEDs) to output, rest to input A var byte mainloop: PORTB = 0 ' Turn off LEDs ' Check any button pressed to toggle on LED If PORTB.7 = 0 Then ' If 1st button pressed... PORTB.5 = 1 ' Turn on 1st LED A=A+1 if a=255 then a=a-1 HPWM 1,A,1000 Endif If PORTB.6 = 0 Then ' If 2nd button pressed... PORTB.4 = 1 ' Turn on 2nd LED a=A-1 if a=1 then a=a+1 HPWM 1,a,1000 Endif Pause 15 ' Pause 2mS Goto mainloop ' Do it forever End
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
There are a lot of books available for picbasic, but very few for picbasic pro.
Is there anywhere information of side to side comparison of these two BASICs? I found that pro has hardware pwm, interrupts and some other features, but I'd like to see the complete list.
Hi,
There are several flavours of "PIC BASIC" from different vendors and manufacturers. This forum, as you know, is really only targeting the compilers from MicroEngineering Labs. So when you see a reference to "PIC Basic" on the net or in a book, make sure you understand which manufacturers compiler they are really talking about.
If you're talking about comparing the features of the original PIC BASIC Compiler from MELABS to the PRO version of the same compiler I don't see the purpose since the old version is discontinued. Besides, if you think PBP is complicated you wouldn't want to use PBC.
If you want to compare the three different version of PBP3 then you can do so here. As far as I know all commands are available in all versions, however the experimenter and silver edition is limited in the number of supported devices. The silver edition, for example, does not support 18F series and therefor you can't use LONG variables.
just download the PBP3 Manual ... if you dare reading it, of course !
http://pbp3.com/downloads/PBP_Reference_Manual.pdf
Alain
Last edited by Acetronics2; - 5th March 2013 at 13:31.
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
Bookmarks