Yes Jerson. That was it. It was too late here, so...
Thanks for correcting.
Ioannis
Yes Jerson. That was it. It was too late here, so...
Thanks for correcting.
Ioannis
Darrel thank you for pointing out where the error was. So obvious that I could not see it!
I have an improvment (mark2) and I will be glad to post it, if you could test it under the same condition as for mark1.
I am asking that since you have suggested to create another thread for testing the various statistical manipolation of the raw data. So please let me know if you are going to create this thread or if I can post it here.
Thank you again for your work.
Cheers
Al.
All progress began with an idea
Sure, post it here. This thread is about your routines.
My stuff is at the office, so I'll run it and the moving average Monday (if I don't get snowed in).
I'm still thinking about starting the other thread, but it needs to use a bigger chip, have different noise types and frequencies, use pre-sampled datasets so they're each working with the same samples, maybe some software and circuits to automate the process, etc. .... it may be awhile.
DT
Bookmarks