You can increase the current to the maximum the LED's can accept in pulse operation and then light them in turn with a low duty cycle.
Ioannis
You can increase the current to the maximum the LED's can accept in pulse operation and then light them in turn with a low duty cycle.
Ioannis
May be I should have been more specific.
Check MBI5026.
This is a shift register. Use as many as you need.
And the current can be adjusted.
"If the Earth were a single state, Istanbul would be its capital." Napoleon Bonaparte
AN234, figure 11
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/e...tes/00234a.pdf
This is the technique I meant by blinking the LEDs in sequence (multiplexing right?).
- Let's say a complete 7-segment LED consumes 20mA.
- If I turn Q1 on/off, then Q2 on/off, and so on, really fast.
Wouldn't it only consume 20mA since only one 7-segment is lit at one time?
The human eye would see them as all on, no? Kind of like screen refresh rates.
Robert
If you light a LED for 10% of the time, fast enough, then your eye will of course see it ON but not bright. Maybe not 10% of the LED normal brightness but sure dim. So you have to increase the drive current.
That is what Alain meant by "No miracle when energy speaking ... never !"
Ioannis
Ok, so multiplexing LEDs really is the same as PWM but in a group.
Time-sharing lightbulbs.
I guess I won't have a choice but to make a compromise on what Alain suggested; PICs go through a pre-programmed sequence lighting a group of LEDs across all panels.
Robert
Bookmarks