Back from 6 yrs away - best in circuit programmer/breadboard?

[PickyPerson]

Got - it - thanks! PicKit3 on its way!

[jellis00]

I too vote for use of Pickit2 for incircuit programming via ICSP on a 6-pin header. I always put a 6-pin header onto every prototype PCB I make for programming and debugging while using Pickit2. And I have to say if you can still buy a Pickit2, buy it rather than a Pickit3....Pickit3 has had many, many problems reported in its use. Pickit2 was time proven.
John

[HenrikOlsson]

Hi John,
Can you elaborate on a problem or two with the PK3?

I mean, I've seen the video and all that but I haven't had much trouble with mine. I kind of bricked it once when I was using the stand alone software but was able to regain control of it by redownloading the OS. Appart from that it's been working perfectly. I'm sure there ARE problems with it - as it most likely is with other programmers as well - but the PK3 product is alive and they (Microchip) are supporting it, if I'm not mistaken.

I've read various reports on newer PIC models not being supported by the older PK2 but I'm not sure if that involves the stand-alone software, MPLAB, both or none.

/Henrik.

[spcw1234]

The PIC Kit 2 is still available. I don't use PICKit, but was planning on picking up the PICKit 3 soon. Maybe I will have to do more research on them. Here is a link to the PICKit 2 from mouser.

[Demon]

I use the Melabs U2 programmer for ICSP.

I made my own ICSD using the schematic that is floating around.

Robert

[Darrel Taylor]

The PICkit2 is now "static".
No new parts are being added to it.

Already, there are many parts that the PICkit2 cannot program.
All new devices are only added to the PICkit 3.

If you are buying one now, get the PICkit 3.

I have a PICkit 2, PICkit 3, ICD 3 and melabs U2 on my desk.
Only the U2 is ever used. With the exception of troubleshooting for someone else that is using a PICkit.

[Heckler]

Hey Picky,

I think that Microchip may have fixed most of the problems with the PICKIT3... (I do not have the 3 so someone else can correct me) but I have linked to two videos on youtube that give a look at the early problems with the 3 version.

The first video was posted back in '09 and the second video is Microchips (quite funny) response to the critique.

take a look...

[jellis00]

Hi John,
Can you elaborate on a problem or two with the PK3?

Henrick, I shied away from PICKIT3 because of the videos and also a couple of postings of problems with it that I can no longer find. But I can't point to any personal problems with it because I never bought one...just stayed with my time proven PICKIT2.

In reading the posts below it sounds like I had better consider trading up to PICKIT3...or maybe an melabs U3. Have never studied the melabs U3 that DT mentions.....does it let you do incircuit programming via ICSP header?
Regards, John

[Demon]

...

In reading the posts below it sounds like I had better consider trading up to PICKIT3...or maybe an melabs U3. Have never studied the melabs U3 that DT mentions.....does it let you do incircuit programming via ICSP header?
Regards, John

It's a U2 and yes you can ICSP via header.

[Archangel]

I too vote for use of Pickit2 for incircuit programming via ICSP on a 6-pin header. I always put a 6-pin header onto every prototype PCB I make for programming and debugging while using Pickit2. And I have to say if you can still buy a Pickit2, buy it rather than a Pickit3....Pickit3 has had many, many problems reported in its use. Pickit2 was time proven.
John

In fact Microchip still sells the PICKit 2, or you can buy a Clone from Sure Electronics on eBay for about 1/2 the price. My old PICKit2 failed and I bought a clone replacement and it is good.