A REALLY accurate clock.


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 25 of 25

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    869


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A REALLY accurate clock.

    But Charles, is that part of the "not allowed to post" code?
    -Bert

    The glass is not half full or half empty, Its twice as big as needed for the job!

    http://foamcasualty.com/ - Warbird R/C scratch building with foam!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Campbell, CA
    Posts
    1,107


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A REALLY accurate clock.

    Unfortunately, yes. I shouldn't have even mentioned it. I'm pretty proud of it, though!
    Charles Linquist

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    869


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A REALLY accurate clock.

    Well it does at least prove it can be done, so for that you get a point. but wait- you started picking on the 16f guys again, so I must subtract half a point. So you are still half good- LOL
    -Bert

    The glass is not half full or half empty, Its twice as big as needed for the job!

    http://foamcasualty.com/ - Warbird R/C scratch building with foam!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Campbell, CA
    Posts
    1,107


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A REALLY accurate clock.

    I'm actually slowly rewriting my SNMP routines to take advantage of ArrayRead and ArrayWrite. They simplify things a bit, and it also makes the code more understandable and maintainable.
    And I'm not really picking on people who use 16F chips. It isn't their fault that they are misinformed.
    Charles Linquist

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    323


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A REALLY accurate clock.

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Linquis View Post
    And I'm not really picking on people who use 16F chips. It isn't their fault that they are misinformed.
    We're not necessarily misinformed... we just have a lot of old stock to burn up still.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    224


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A REALLY accurate clock.

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Linquis View Post
    And I'm not really picking on people who use 16F chips. It isn't their fault that they are misinformed.
    May I ask what you mean by 'misinformed', please?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Campbell, CA
    Posts
    1,107


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A REALLY accurate clock.

    It is just my continuous jab at those who continue to use 16F parts. There are not many times when a 16F part is the best for an application. 18F parts have advantages in speed, code efficiency, better peripherals, if you run out of program space, there are (usually) larger parts in the same family that you can easily move to.
    They can deal with large arrays and you can use LONG integers with PBP.

    And, they generally cost no more than their "little brothers".
    Charles Linquist

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    224


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A REALLY accurate clock.

    I understand what you're saying and I agree (generally) with your premises but you shouldn't dismiss or exclude the 12F and 16F "enhanced" midrange devices. They're pretty potent with a 32-MHz clock, linear RAM address mapping, an interesting assortment of peripherals (some not found on 'legacy' 18F devices), and an excellent price/performance ratio. In fact, I can think of one case where the new FVR (fixed voltage reference) module is found on some 18F "K" series devices and on some 12F/16F "enhanced" devices, but the "K" series devices can't use the FVR output as the ADC +vref input as can be done on the 12F/16F "enhanced" devices.
    Last edited by Mike, K8LH; - 6th October 2011 at 23:52.

Members who have read this thread : 2

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts