PBP 2.50 with 16F722A

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. - 19th August 2011, 08:50 #1
    mister_e's Avatar
    mister_e
    mister_e is offline Contributor
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: PBP 2.50 with 16F722A

    Your first stop: microchip migration note from the non A to A, then see what's different.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
  2. - 19th August 2011, 11:13 #2
    luminas's Avatar
    luminas
    luminas is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Area 71
    Posts
    52

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: PBP 2.50 with 16F722A

    The device is virtually same, please take a look :

    http://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts...ct2=PIC16F722A

    As PBP 2.50 has no INC file for 16F722A , can I use MPASM INC file instead ?

    or am I missing something here ?
  3. - 19th August 2011, 11:14 #3
    mackrackit's Avatar
    mackrackit
    mackrackit is offline SuperMod
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: PBP 2.50 with 16F722A

    Looks like support for the A version started in PBP 2.6.
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.
  4. - 19th August 2011, 11:19 #4
    mackrackit's Avatar
    mackrackit
    mackrackit is offline SuperMod
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: PBP 2.50 with 16F722A

    The *.inc files are not the same. You will need to get an upgrade.
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.
  5. - 19th August 2011, 16:03 #5
    mister_e's Avatar
    mister_e
    mister_e is offline Contributor
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: PBP 2.50 with 16F722A

    well I would compile for the non A, and try. But yeah, an upgrade never hurt.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules