Pbp3

[Darrel Taylor]

Go to Help > About in the meProg software.

[Sneaky-geek]

Thanks Darrel,
Amazing what you can forget when you do not check on it often.
Now to MELabs site to see how antique Ver. 4.23 is.


Terry K9HA

[tecleoalves]

Hello everybody.

I wonder if anyone has had experience aa compile a program with PBP3. I wonder if a program previously compiled in version 2.5 can have your code when compiling with reduced PBP3.

I wait for answers ...

[mister_e]

Hi and Welcome on the forum,
Not sure to understand your question, I feel a sort of language barrier in here. No problem, so let me guess.

Yes a code compiled in PBP 2.50 will also compile with PBP3, BUT if it's USB, you'll need to modify it to suit the next USB requirement since v2.60.

Reduced PBP3... this one I'm not sure of what you mean.. There's the full demo version which work for 30 days, this one no problem. But there's also The Gold and Experimenter version who have their limitations listed in the following link when you click on the Compare Edition tab.
http://store.melabs.com/cat/PBP.html

HTH

[HenrikOlsson]

Hi,
You mean if PBP3 is more efficient, producing smaller code than earlier versions?

My current project compiles to the exact same size (currently around 12k) between 2.6 and 3.0, no difference at all. I don't have 2.5 on my system so I can't compare.

/Henrik.

[tecleoalves]

Thanks Henrik, this is my doubt...

[aratti]

Question!

Page 58 of PBP3 manual state that DEFINE statement and all parameters associated should be always in upper case.

This should be read: " with the exeption of the define statement ", since microcode editor turn the word DEFINE into lower case.

Is the above correct?


Al.