PBP Support for 12F1840 8-Pin Device?


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    409


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: PBP Support for 12F1840 8-Pin Device?

    Thanks Alain, but the price is a bit out of my range to simply support a single new device.
    I'm not asking for more development on 2.6, I'm asking if it was ever done.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: PBP Support for 12F1840 8-Pin Device?

    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie View Post
    Thanks Alain, but the price is a bit out of my range to simply support a single new device.
    I'm not asking for more development on 2.6, I'm asking if it was ever done.
    I WIN !!!

    so, you just have to create the relevant "include" files from some existing similar ones ... libraries are open.

    nowhere, nobody works for free ...

    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    409


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: PBP Support for 12F1840 8-Pin Device?

    I might do that... is it just the include files?
    How do I get it in the pull down list of devices?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    30


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: PBP Support for 12F1840 8-Pin Device?

    springtank's solution worked for me totally fine on pbp 2.6 (Thanks one more time!)

    A compiled .hex file of 1822 , also worked 'as is' on the 1840!

    I used many registers in my program (can't remember now) ,
    and i remember first ,i compared the two pic memory maps (18f40 and 16f628) and were same ,
    the only differences were the extra registers on the bigger pic.

    ps. don't expect to get '18F40' on pull down list , just use springtank's guide.
    Last edited by LakisFM1; - 10th November 2012 at 08:34.

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts