question for math wizards

[aajgss]

Archangel

Thanks for the info. I think that may be the way to go. A 12 or 14 bit ADC may give me enough resolution.

Robert,
You hit the nail on the head. Exactly what I was meaning.

From the Manual
"PBP is the DOS version of the compiler. PBPW is the Windows version
of the compiler and can take advantage of all the PC’s memory. PBPL is
the long version of the compiler and can use 32-bit variables, as well as
all of the PC’s memory under Windows. PBPL can only be used with the
PIC18 devices.",

But when I use a LONG variable and get the same answer as not using it I am stuck between "Did I do it right" or " Do I have the right version. Do I have PBPL" Where does it say "The version you are using is PBPL or PBP? As far as I know I am using PicBasic Pro. The executable that MCS or MPASM runs is PBP.EXE

Remember, I am only new at this and finding this type of info that others take as commonplace is not so straight forward for a beginner like me. I also do a lot of searching this and other forums/ websites, but again I feel that I am expected to know this as its "simple stuff".

Please note, I am not trying to offend or anything like that, just trying to highlight some of the frustrations I have with finding / understanding the "simple stuff"

Regards
aajgss

[aajgss]

Sorry Acetronics, I did mean to address you, instead I put Archangel

aajgss

[Demon]

...But when I use a LONG variable and get the same answer as not using it I am stuck between "Did I do it right" or " Do I have the right version. Do I have PBPL" Where does it say "The version you are using is PBPL or PBP? As far as I know I am using PicBasic Pro. The executable that MCS or MPASM runs is PBP.EXE

Remember, I am only new at this and finding this type of info that others take as commonplace is not so straight forward for a beginner like me. I also do a lot of searching this and other forums/ websites, but again I feel that I am expected to know this as its "simple stuff".

Please note, I am not trying to offend or anything like that, just trying to highlight some of the frustrations I have with finding / understanding the "simple stuff"

Regards
aajgss

Can you give us more details on exactly what tools (software/hardware) you use?

I have yet to use long division either. Off the top of my head, I recall a setting in
MeLabs programmer to state what compiler/options to use.

EDIT: Correction, in MicroCode Studio.

- View.
- Compile & Program options

There is a toggle to Use PBPL. (I have MicroCode Studio Plus version, can't comment for sure on basic version)

I would start by enabling that if I were to use PBPL on a PIC 18F device.

The first thing I would do is a simple test program connected to a LCD.
That way I would make sure to learn how to use the syntax properly
before integrating it into a larger program.

[aajgss]

Thanks Robert,

I am using PBP V2.6 with a PicKit 2 programmer and a low pin count USB board and 18F14K50.

I have had some success by enabling PBPL in MCS.

The values I am after and the values I get are really close. Probably close enough for this particular project.

mmH2O _______Knots ________Pic Output to serial port
15_____________ 30______________ 30.09
26.5 ___________40_______________39.56
41.5 ___________50_______________50.16
60 _____________60______________60.19
81.5 ___________70______________69.61
106.5 __________80______________80.2
134.5 __________90______________89.72
166.5 _________100______________99.75
201 ___________110_____________109.79
239.5 _________120_____________119.8


To get these values I used

 
knots var long
knotsRem var long
counts var long
pause 100
MAINLOOP
for counts = 0 to 10000 
knots = ((SQR(counts*100))*1563)/10000
knotsRem = (SQR(counts*100)*1563)//10000
serout2 portb.7,396,[ #Knots,".",dec3 knotsRem," ",#counts,","," Knots",13,10]
'pause 10
next
Goto Mainloop

But there are a few "oddities" I dont know how to deal with.One thing I did see was a printout like this. 1st coulmn is Knots and the second
the counts corresponding to that value.the question I have is why so many values the same, and then it jumps by about .5 knots. As I said, not critical in this instance, but may be in a future project and if I can get it sorted now all the better.

143.708 8404, Knots
143.708 8405, Knots
143.708 8406, Knots
143.708 8407, Knots
143.708 8408, Knots
143.271 8409, Knots
143.271 8410, Knots
143.271 8411, Knots
143.271 8412, Knots
143.271 8413, Knots
143.271 8414, Knots
143.271 8415, Knots

I am guessing its the integer math thing again, just after some clarification


Acetronics,
Yes, its not me its Excel !!

I did recalculate it in Excel by using the "ROUND" function, but his rounds up or down. I would expect that integer math always rounds down. I am guessing correctly?
Thanks
aajgss

[Acetronics2]

Acetronics,

Yes, its not me its Excel !!

Are you really sure your Math is good ???

I'm not ...

for counts = 0 to 10000
knots = ((SQR(counts*100))*1563)/10000
knotsRem = (SQR(counts*100)*1563)//10000

1) due to your ADC ... "Counts" granularity is 1/1024 or 1/4096 ( let's dream ) ... just a detail ... but important.

2) knots = ((SQR(counts*100))*1563)/10000 = SQR ( counts ) * 1563 / 1000 ... YESSS, no need to multiply "Counts", as granularity will remain the same ... !!!

3) you can't use the remainder trick ... as it is a SQUARE function ... remember SQR ( A ) + SQR ( B ) != SQR ( A+B )

Ok, I don't have the easy solution at the time ... but' Im on the way !!!

Alain

[aajgss]

Hi Acetronics,

Here is some brief details of what I did and why I did it.

ADC CountsADC VoltsmmH2OKnots10.00030.0411.5620.00060.0812.2130.00090.1222.71

[aajgss]

Hi Acetronics,

Here is some brief details of what I did and why I did it.

ADC Counts              ADC Volts           mmH2O         Knots

1                       0.0003              0.041         1.56 

2                       0.0006              0.081         2.21 

3                       0.0009              0.122         2.71



now using

knots = ((SQR(counts))*1563)

and looking at the integer value that I would expect would be returned

ADC Counts     ADC Volts     mmH2O      SQR(counts)       Integer valuegives me     Knots
1             0.0003        0.041         1                       1                  1.56

2             0.0006        0.081         1.414                   1                  1.56

3             0.0009        0.122         1.73                    1                  1.56



now using

knots = ((SQR(counts*100))*1563)/10000



ADC Counts     ADC Volts     mmH2O      SQR(counts*100)       Integer valuegives me     Knots

1              0.0003        0.041             10                    10               1.56
2              0.0006        0.081             14.14                 14               2.188
3              0.0009        0.122             17.32                 17               2.657

So I guess what I am saying is that it was the only way I could see of getting close to the resolution I needed.

As for the remainder, that is the .56 at 1 count, .188 at 2 counts etc.

Anyway, that was my train of thought. I am sure there must be a simpler way, i'm just not able to see it. Well I'm off to find that section of the forum for ideas to improve PBP "Floating Point Math"

regards
aajgss

[Demon]

Yup, I tried three counts in Open Office Calc using 2 versions of the formula and got identical results:

((SQRT(cell))*1563)/1000
((SQRT(cell*100))*1563)/10000

1  1.563
2  2.210
3  2.707

Are those above the expected results?


Or are these?

1  1.560
2  2.188
3  2.657