A more program space efficient way of doing ta whole heap of IFs????


Results 1 to 18 of 18

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    653

    Default A more program space efficient way of doing ta whole heap of IFs????

    I'm putting my nooby hat firmly back on here!

    This following chain of multiple IFs, is absolutely slaughtering my modest 12lf1822's program space, I wonder if anyone would be so kind to offer up a better way (ie uses less code space) of approaching this....

    Code:
    if supply_in>= 253  then max_duty = 154
    if supply_in> 250 and supply_in< 254 then max_duty = 155
    if supply_in> 248 and supply_in< 251 then max_duty = 156
    if supply_in> 245 and supply_in< 249 then max_duty = 157
    if supply_in> 240 and supply_in< 243 then max_duty = 159
    if supply_in> 237 and supply_in< 241 then max_duty = 160
    if supply_in> 234 and supply_in< 238 then max_duty = 161
    if supply_in> 231 and supply_in< 235 then max_duty = 163
    if supply_in> 229 and supply_in< 232 then max_duty = 165
    if supply_in> 226 and supply_in< 230 then max_duty = 167
    if supply_in> 223 and supply_in< 227 then max_duty = 169
    if supply_in> 220 and supply_in< 224 then max_duty = 172
    if supply_in> 218 and supply_in< 221 then max_duty = 175
    if supply_in> 215 and supply_in< 219 then max_duty = 179
    if supply_in> 212 and supply_in< 216 then max_duty = 181
    if supply_in> 210 and supply_in< 213 then max_duty = 182
    if supply_in> 207 and supply_in< 211 then max_duty = 184
    if supply_in> 204 and supply_in< 208 then max_duty = 188
    if supply_in> 201 and supply_in< 205 then max_duty = 191
    if supply_in> 199 and supply_in< 202 then max_duty = 195
    if supply_in> 196 and supply_in< 200 then max_duty = 214
    if supply_in> 193 and supply_in< 197 then max_duty = 238
    if supply_in> 187 and supply_in<194 then max_duty = 251
    if supply_in< 188   then max_duty = 255
    Surprisingly, (to me at least) a 'select case' used even more program, space (which I realise would be quicker & more efficient, but I've got to roll with whatever takes the least amount of program space presently!

    Could an array be brought into play or similar?
    Last edited by HankMcSpank; - 26th May 2011 at 21:59.

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts