Quote Originally Posted by Dick Ivers View Post
Hank, Please note from the first post that an advantage of interrupts without DT_INTS is a major saving in code space. My sample program compiled with 625 fewer program words when using the 16F1828 vs. a 16F690.
The test program I ran in post #14 compiled to 133 words without DT-INTS, and 153 words with DT_INTS.
I don't think the code savings was due to not using DT_INTS.

That's using an ASM type INT_Handler. If using a PBP type handler, it goes up to 285 words.
But that's not a good comparison, because if you want to do PBP type interrupts without DT_INTS the program will get huge from all the checks placed between every line of code.