Quote Originally Posted by mackrackit View Post
If the remotes are constantly sending data then you should be good with sending an ID.
What you basically do is treat the ID like a checksum. If the checksum is correct the data is saved/used. Same with an ID. If ID=r1 then data is from remote #1.
Dave, in that case wouldnt there be constant collisions in the incoming packets, affecting the validity of the actual data seen by the receiver?

Anand