Using AND OR operators in combination

[plyrathrt]

While I couldn't figure out the logic to all the ('s, I tried it anyway but I get "bad expression" when compiling.

I have tried it many different ways with no luck. I spoke with Micro-engineering labs as well and they looked at the post and said that the way you describe, is the correct way but they were unsure if your "exact" expression would work.

Any other thoughts? Could it be because my expressions check a variable as well as a pin state?

This is the 3 expressions I need to break in to individual expression during an UNTIL function. If confusing, I have seperated the 3 expressions below the example.

EXAMPLE:
(Y >= 0) and (BUTTON1 = BUTTONPRESS) OR (Y = 1) AND (BUTTON2 = BUTTONPRESS) OR (Y > 2) AND (BUTTON3 = BUTTONPRESS)

The 3 expressions seperated by the OR
(Y >= 0) and (BUTTON1 = BUTTONPRESS)
(Y = 1) AND (BUTTON2 = BUTTONPRESS)
(Y > 2) AND (BUTTON3 = BUTTONPRESS)

[HenrikOlsson]

Hi,
Have you tried

(Y >= 0 and BUTTON1 = BUTTONPRESS) OR (Y = 1 AND BUTTON2 = BUTTONPRESS) OR (Y > 2 AND BUTTON3 = BUTTONPRESS)

or perhaps

((Y >= 0) and (BUTTON1 = BUTTONPRESS)) OR ((Y = 1) AND (BUTTON2 = BUTTONPRESS)) OR ((Y > 2) AND (BUTTON3 = BUTTONPRESS))

[cncmachineguy]

I too am not sure why the first example from shahidali55 didn't work. Seems all the () are in place. Of the 2 from Henrick I think the second will be best.

Having said that, Even if it works, I am not sure you will save code space using it. It will take a lot of ASM to make that statement.

Another idea may be to go back to your original post and make the common lines a subroutine. this way the pause1000 will only be coded once and you won't have the complicated until expression.

Of course you will have to verify by looking at the compiled size.