Absolutely, but shifting before checking bit0 is different from checking bit0 before shifting ;-)I am pretty sure I put the shift inside the loop
I haven't yet tried Darrels version but I have looked at the ASM code it compiles to and as far as I can see it's now "longer" than what my current code compiles to. I'm actually starting to doubt it'll do the 9 byte test sequence in 825 cycles. Darrel, are you there?
Thanks!
/Henrik.
Bookmarks