Turning a smoke machine on/off with a triac


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mansfield, UK
    Posts
    697

    Default Turning a smoke machine on/off with a triac

    Hi, For a while now I've been using PICs/optos/triacs to activate smoke machines. I would like to know though if its possible (or safe) to turn the power to the entire machine on/off. Instead of just the pump motor I will be controlling the huge heating coil aswell.

    My smoke machines are in the range of 700-800W 240V. I work that out to be 3.3A max. The triacs I've been using to control the motors are capable of switching 8A at 600V. That sounds perfectly safe to me but as I usually stick to low voltage and its a big coil instead of a simple bulb I would like a second opinion.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Most commercial model I know and see on my workbench each months just use a Relay for the Heater but a Triac for the pump (obviously for flow/burst control). If your control is not fancy, you could just use relays, but if you manage the heater temp, the smoke flow/burst, current limit, etc etc... then TRIACs (BTA serie with built-in snubbers) are the obvious choice.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mansfield, UK
    Posts
    697


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Ok, Thanks. I will go with the triac then. I'm using BTA already so thats good.

    I did think about using a relay but I've used those in the past for the pump motor and they cause all nearby PICs to reset (I had a post on here a few years ago about it). The solution was to use triacs. I've used diodes in the past on the low voltage side of relays to stop current flowing backwards. Maybe something like that on the high voltage side would fix the problem but I would rather use a triac instead.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    448


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    A triac would be fine. Even better, add a few lines to detect the zero crossing, and switch on right after that. That should reduce the inrush current.

    Regards,

    Anand

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mansfield, UK
    Posts
    697


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Good idea. I have at least 1 pin spare on the PIC. I'll do the same for the pump too

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    432


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ardhuru View Post
    A triac would be fine. Even better, add a few lines to detect the zero crossing, and switch on right after that. That should reduce the inrush current.

    Regards,

    Anand
    Or drive the triac with an opto isolator that includes zero crossing detection.
    Keith

    www.diyha.co.uk
    www.kat5.tv

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts