can you make name variables?

[anj]

Gday Ralph
The problem Peter is trying to overcome is explained in the bottom para of his initial post, and is the same one i hit.
When doing the same function multiple times, it is more efficient to build a subroutine. However, if one of the "variables" in that subroutine is a port, yr stuffed.
By referencing the reqd port the way described, you can set a std integer variable before entering the subroutine, thus bypassing the problem.

However, it doesnt always work ( according to Melanie ). But it does work for simple on/off type stuff.

Andrew

[NavMicroSystems]

When doing the same function multiple times, it is more efficient to build a subroutine.

Andrew, that's absolutely right,
but if you don't let us know what the SUB requires as input and what it
deliveres as output,
we cant offer much help.

[anj]

Gday Ralph
As per Peters original request

If I copy the routine and have 3 of them for a.1, a.2, a.3 I run out of code space.

Having been down the track he went down, i understood his post as meaning he currently had a routine that he would have to copy three times unless he could pass by reference, a port as a variable ( which you cant do ).
As such all other inputs/outputs were irrelevant at the time, just how to ref a port.
If he has other probs with his routines, i dont know, i merely advised of a different method i have used to get around referencing ports in subroutines.

Andrew