SPI interface


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: SPI interface

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    All doable, but I don't think you can access MikroE library to see how they implement their SPI_Ethernet_x routine huh?

    I think you could probably port some "open source" routine, say C18, to PBP.

    If your time is short, sometimes you may want to stick with a language that already work and learn it rather than reinvent the wheel.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  2. #2
    malc-c's Avatar
    malc-c Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Steve, nice to see you back

    Yeah... I must admit I really want to sick with PBP but with other languages already having library files for this sort of thing, then it is tempting to move over to the dark side !

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    You can change a car transmission with a flat screwdriver, but it need a bit more work Same goes for compiler. Compilers are just tools, there's nothing bad using more than one, use the one that fits your requirement.

    If you feel you may have some requirement for it in the future, I suggest you to port some existing libraries. There's some in C18 on Microchip's website. THere's also some pre-canned solution like ethernet module (Rabbit, Charon, Lantronix etc etc).
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts