A new MPLAB IDE


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 56

Thread: A new MPLAB IDE

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Maybe if you posted your code and configs it would help.

    Or just install from your CD when you can.... That is what it is for. Everything you need in one convenient place.
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Sorted now it was the configs :roll: Appologies for doubting the gurus on here

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    Hi, All

    Great News ...

    MPLABX supports PBP Now ....

    Sure Charles could tell us some words about it ... ( about the use or not of PBPMPLAB.bat ... i.e.)

    and may be explain me that ...

    /usr/bin/make -f nbproject/Makefile-default.mk SUBPROJECTS= .build-conf
    make[1]: Entering directory `/c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Projets/X/Lights.X'
    /usr/bin/make -f nbproject/Makefile-default.mk dist/default/production/Lights.X.production.cof
    make[2]: Entering directory `/c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Projets/X/Lights.X'
    mkdir -p build/default/production
    C:\\Program\ Files\\Microchip\\MPLAB\ IDE\\PBP\\PBPW.EXE -ampasmx -k# -p12f675 Lights.pbp
    make[2]: *** [build/default/production/Lights\.cof] Error 1
    make[1]: *** [.build-conf] Error 2
    make: *** [.build-impl] Error 2
    PICBASIC PRO(TM) Compiler 2.60C, (c) 1998, 2011 microEngineering Labs, Inc.
    All Rights Reserved.
    ERROR: Unable to execute mpasmx.make[2]: Leaving directory `/c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Projets/X/Lights.X'
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Projets/X/Lights.X'
    BUILD FAILED (exit value 2, total time: 609ms)
    Alain
    Last edited by Acetronics2; - 5th May 2011 at 13:43.
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,612


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    Yes, do tell us more please.
    I've been playing around with the evaluation version of UltraEdit and I'm starting to get code folding and syntax highlighting to a place where I want it but there are many other things that needs sorting (and removed from the default layout) for it to be worth it.

    If MBLAB X is the bee's knees then there's no need to spend the time and cash on UE.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    3,154


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    How does this compare with Mecanique Microcode Studio Plus?

    Is it worth changing if I'm used to MCSP?

    I know it's free, but MCSP is already paid.

    I remember looking at MPLAB when I first started and it didn't look as user friendly as MCS, things just didn't look at intuitive. It could have been just me, tastes and first impressions affect our choices so drastically.
    My Creality Ender 3 S1 Plus is a giant paperweight that can't even be used as a boat anchor, cause I'd be fined for polluting our waterways with electronic devices.

    Not as dumb as yesterday, but stupider than tomorrow!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    IMPORTANT

    For beta 6 support PICBASIC PRO and CCSC was added. However, support to import an MPLAB 8 project using this compilers is not there yet. You need to recreate the projects using the "Standalone Project" wizard.
    Also, to use the PICBASIC PRO, you might need to add mpasmx to your path: add $InstallationDir\mpasmx. For example, if you installed to the default MPLAB X installation directory in a 32 bit Windows system, you'd need this in your path:
    C:\Program Files\Microchip\MPLABX\mpasmx

    Do this if you get the error:
    ERROR: Unable to execute mpasmx.make[2]:

    If you change your path, you need to re-start MPLAB X.
    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,132


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    I sure agree with you Robert.

    The MPLAB feels like the ... bad old DOS environment.

    I prefer the MCS too.

    The X is different from the old 8.xx and promisses to give some whistles and bells.

    If anyone has tested the editor please report.

    I do not want to download the over 200Mb beast just to see that I do not like it...

    Ioannis

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts