2.60A I'm away on holiday and dont have by pbp cd with me.
It's not setting the configs twice. The link I posted seems to suggest something has chan ged with mpasm.
2.60A I'm away on holiday and dont have by pbp cd with me.
It's not setting the configs twice. The link I posted seems to suggest something has chan ged with mpasm.
Last edited by retepsnikrep; - 29th January 2011 at 19:14.
Maybe if you posted your code and configs it would help.
Or just install from your CD when you can.... That is what it is for. Everything you need in one convenient place.
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
Sorted now it was the configs :roll: Appologies for doubting the gurus on here
Hi, All
Great News ...
MPLABX supports PBP Now ....
Sure Charles could tell us some words about it ... ( about the use or not of PBPMPLAB.bat ... i.e.)
and may be explain me that ...
Alain/usr/bin/make -f nbproject/Makefile-default.mk SUBPROJECTS= .build-conf
make[1]: Entering directory `/c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Projets/X/Lights.X'
/usr/bin/make -f nbproject/Makefile-default.mk dist/default/production/Lights.X.production.cof
make[2]: Entering directory `/c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Projets/X/Lights.X'
mkdir -p build/default/production
C:\\Program\ Files\\Microchip\\MPLAB\ IDE\\PBP\\PBPW.EXE -ampasmx -k# -p12f675 Lights.pbp
make[2]: *** [build/default/production/Lights\.cof] Error 1
make[1]: *** [.build-conf] Error 2
make: *** [.build-impl] Error 2
PICBASIC PRO(TM) Compiler 2.60C, (c) 1998, 2011 microEngineering Labs, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
ERROR: Unable to execute mpasmx.make[2]: Leaving directory `/c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Projets/X/Lights.X'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Projets/X/Lights.X'
BUILD FAILED (exit value 2, total time: 609ms)
Last edited by Acetronics2; - 5th May 2011 at 14:43.
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
Yes, do tell us more please.
I've been playing around with the evaluation version of UltraEdit and I'm starting to get code folding and syntax highlighting to a place where I want it but there are many other things that needs sorting (and removed from the default layout) for it to be worth it.
If MBLAB X is the bee's knees then there's no need to spend the time and cash on UE.
Download is here :
http://www.microchip.com/en_US/family/mplabx/index.html
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
How does this compare with Mecanique Microcode Studio Plus?
Is it worth changing if I'm used to MCSP?
I know it's free, but MCSP is already paid.
I remember looking at MPLAB when I first started and it didn't look as user friendly as MCS, things just didn't look at intuitive. It could have been just me, tastes and first impressions affect our choices so drastically.
My Creality Ender 3 S1 Plus is a giant paperweight that can't even be used as a boat anchor, cause I'd be fined for polluting our waterways with electronic devices.
Not as dumb as yesterday, but stupider than tomorrow!
Bookmarks