A new MPLAB IDE


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 56

Thread: A new MPLAB IDE

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    3,170


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    How does this compare with Mecanique Microcode Studio Plus?

    Is it worth changing if I'm used to MCSP?

    I know it's free, but MCSP is already paid.

    I remember looking at MPLAB when I first started and it didn't look as user friendly as MCS, things just didn't look at intuitive. It could have been just me, tastes and first impressions affect our choices so drastically.
    My Creality Ender 3 S1 Plus is a giant paperweight that can't even be used as a boat anchor, cause I'd be fined for polluting our waterways with electronic devices.

    Not as dumb as yesterday, but stupider than tomorrow!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    IMPORTANT

    For beta 6 support PICBASIC PRO and CCSC was added. However, support to import an MPLAB 8 project using this compilers is not there yet. You need to recreate the projects using the "Standalone Project" wizard.
    Also, to use the PICBASIC PRO, you might need to add mpasmx to your path: add $InstallationDir\mpasmx. For example, if you installed to the default MPLAB X installation directory in a 32 bit Windows system, you'd need this in your path:
    C:\Program Files\Microchip\MPLABX\mpasmx

    Do this if you get the error:
    ERROR: Unable to execute mpasmx.make[2]:

    If you change your path, you need to re-start MPLAB X.
    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,133


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    I sure agree with you Robert.

    The MPLAB feels like the ... bad old DOS environment.

    I prefer the MCS too.

    The X is different from the old 8.xx and promisses to give some whistles and bells.

    If anyone has tested the editor please report.

    I do not want to download the over 200Mb beast just to see that I do not like it...

    Ioannis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    604


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    Quote Originally Posted by Ioannis View Post
    The X is different from the old 8.xx and promisses to give some whistles and bells.

    If anyone has tested the editor please report.

    I do not want to download the over 200Mb beast just to see that I do not like it...

    Ioannis
    Plenty of user experiences over at the MCHP Forums http://www.microchip.com/forums/default.aspx
    Why pay for overpriced toys when you can have
    professional grade tools for FREE!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,612


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    Hi,
    How does this compare with Mecanique Microcode Studio Plus?
    MCSP is great but it doesn't seem to be maintained any more which is unfortunate. It lacks code folding (so does MPLAB 8.xx when used with PBP, AFAIK) and it lacks "true" source level debugging.

    Norm is onto something with his FineLineIDE but I don't think it'll provide source level debugging.

    /Henrik.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,133


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    Quote Originally Posted by rmteo View Post
    Plenty of user experiences over at the MCHP Forums http://www.microchip.com/forums/default.aspx
    Have not found something related to PBP though...

    Ioannis

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    604


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    Perhaps Ace is the only one who has used it with PBP - and he's not telling.
    Why pay for overpriced toys when you can have
    professional grade tools for FREE!!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,133


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: A new MPLAB IDE

    Alain? Are you hiding something from us?

    Ioannis

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts