Download is here :
http://www.microchip.com/en_US/family/mplabx/index.html
Alain
Download is here :
http://www.microchip.com/en_US/family/mplabx/index.html
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
How does this compare with Mecanique Microcode Studio Plus?
Is it worth changing if I'm used to MCSP?
I know it's free, but MCSP is already paid.
I remember looking at MPLAB when I first started and it didn't look as user friendly as MCS, things just didn't look at intuitive. It could have been just me, tastes and first impressions affect our choices so drastically.
My Creality Ender 3 S1 Plus is a giant paperweight that can't even be used as a boat anchor, cause I'd be fined for polluting our waterways with electronic devices.
Not as dumb as yesterday, but stupider than tomorrow!
IMPORTANT
AlainFor beta 6 support PICBASIC PRO and CCSC was added. However, support to import an MPLAB 8 project using this compilers is not there yet. You need to recreate the projects using the "Standalone Project" wizard.
Also, to use the PICBASIC PRO, you might need to add mpasmx to your path: add $InstallationDir\mpasmx. For example, if you installed to the default MPLAB X installation directory in a 32 bit Windows system, you'd need this in your path:
C:\Program Files\Microchip\MPLABX\mpasmx
Do this if you get the error:
ERROR: Unable to execute mpasmx.make[2]:
If you change your path, you need to re-start MPLAB X.
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
I sure agree with you Robert.
The MPLAB feels like the ... bad old DOS environment.
I prefer the MCS too.
The X is different from the old 8.xx and promisses to give some whistles and bells.
If anyone has tested the editor please report.
I do not want to download the over 200Mb beast just to see that I do not like it...
Ioannis
Plenty of user experiences over at the MCHP Forums http://www.microchip.com/forums/default.aspx
Why pay for overpriced toys when you can have
professional grade tools for FREE!!!
Hi,
MCSP is great but it doesn't seem to be maintained any more which is unfortunate. It lacks code folding (so does MPLAB 8.xx when used with PBP, AFAIK) and it lacks "true" source level debugging.How does this compare with Mecanique Microcode Studio Plus?
Norm is onto something with his FineLineIDE but I don't think it'll provide source level debugging.
/Henrik.
Perhaps Ace is the only one who has used it with PBP - and he's not telling.![]()
Why pay for overpriced toys when you can have
professional grade tools for FREE!!!
Bookmarks