I can not remember if 2.50 had 1024 constants. I have not used all 1024 but around 500 or so works with 2.60.


Since your table is linear,
Thanks for pointing that out, it may save someone some confusion.
That probably was not the best example.. Grabbed it from a piece of code that had a non-liner LOOKDOWN feeding the LOOKUP. I was playing with a "K" thermocouple and the reference/junction temperature..
Code:
LOOKDOWN2 TX,>[898,895,892,889,886,883,879,876,873,870,867,863,860,857,854,850,_
847,844,841,838,835,832,828,825,822,819,815,812,809,805,802,799,795,792,788,785,_
782,778,775,772,769,765,762,758,755,751,748,744,741,737,734,731,727,724,721,717,_
713,710,706,703,699,696,692,689,685,682,678,675,671,667,664,660,656,653,650,646,_
643,639,635,632,628,624,620,617,614,610,606,603,599,595,592,588,584,580,577,573,_
570,566,562,558,555,551,547,544,540,536,532,529,525,521,517,513,509,506,502,498,_
495,491,487,483,479,475,471,468,464,460,456,453,449,445,441,437,433,429,426,422,_
418,414,410,406,402,398,395,391,387,383,379,375,371,367,363,360,356,352,348,344,_
340,336,332,328,324,321,317,313,309,305,301,297,293,290,286,282,278,274,270,267,_
263,259,255,252,248,244,240,236,232,229,224,221,217,213,209,206,202,198,194,190,_
187,183,180,176,173],TXI