64-bit division

[Manfred]

Yes, it helps! Now the hundreds of useless messages are gone!

But one problem leads to the next: With PM, I edited the include file for the specific PIC to get the configuration word I need, without having to edit it in the PIC programmer every time. But with MPASM, I get the default config word, and have to edit it! I tried adding directives for the assembler to use the config word I need, but so far this has only led to errors.

Other than that, MPASM is giving the exact same output as PM. So, as long as I still use only 16F devices, I don't see a good reason to use MPASM at all! Is there any?

[mackrackit]

In the same inc file that you set the configs for PM is where you set them for MPASM . Second set of configs.

If you are using 16Fs and straight PBP then PM is fine.

[Manfred]

Oh, stupid me! It even SAYS in the file that the first set is for PM and the other is for MPASM! I didn't notice that... Now it works fine.

Let's blame it to my old age!

Thanks again!

[mackrackit]

Oh, stupid me!

If only I could figure out how to get paid for my stupid mistakes I would have it made.
http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/show...2255#post92255

Have fun!!!