This should help
http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=40
|
This should help
http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=40
Last edited by mackrackit; - 5th August 2010 at 20:09.
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
|
Yes, it helps! Now the hundreds of useless messages are gone!
But one problem leads to the next: With PM, I edited the include file for the specific PIC to get the configuration word I need, without having to edit it in the PIC programmer every time. But with MPASM, I get the default config word, and have to edit it! I tried adding directives for the assembler to use the config word I need, but so far this has only led to errors.
Other than that, MPASM is giving the exact same output as PM. So, as long as I still use only 16F devices, I don't see a good reason to use MPASM at all! Is there any?
|
In the same inc file that you set the configs for PM is where you set them for MPASM . Second set of configs.
If you are using 16Fs and straight PBP then PM is fine.
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
|
Oh, stupid me! It even SAYS in the file that the first set is for PM and the other is for MPASM! I didn't notice that... Now it works fine.
Let's blame it to my old age!
Thanks again!
|
Originally Posted by Manfred
If only I could figure out how to get paid for my stupid mistakes I would have it made.
http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/show...2255#post92255
Have fun!!!
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
Members who have read this thread : 0You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks