'DEFINE OSC 8' seems to be ignored by PBP ?

[mackrackit]

So, anybody understand why the preferred Microchip config method gave me an error ?

Nope, I do not understand it but there are lots of things I do not understand. I just know that the new way does not work well for me when I tried it a time or two so I figure why fight it. Use the way that has worked for years.

Maybe it is something for a later version of MPASM?

[Acetronics2]

Hi, Dave

Just found µChip writes :

@ CONFIG BOR = ON, PWRT = ON, BORV = 27

With spaces around " = " sign ...

too weak to give a decent conclusion...

BTW ... I found a nice tool in the MPLAB Help ... Config values tables for the 18x series !!!
but none for 10,12 and 16 Series

Alain

[mackrackit]

Thanks Alain.
I will give it a try later. But as you mentioned to our masked friend.
If it is not broke do not try fixing it.

Looks like a cleaner way though...

[Bruce]

The new style config directives can't be inserted directly into your code. These only
work when in the default PBP device include files.

See post #3 in this thread; http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=9145&

[Acetronics2]

Hi, Bruce,

Thanks for the tip ...

[Humour ON]

So, If I understand it well ...

When we want non-defaults Configs through PbP, we have to comment the .inc relevant lines ...

And if we want to use the new configs with PbP, we have to re-install them into those .inc files ...

Did I get It correctly ???

[Humour OFF]

Regards
Alain

[mackrackit]

Thanks Bruce!
I like the configs in code space so it looks like the old way is the way for now.

[mr.sneezy]

Thanks Bruce!
I like the configs in code space so it looks like the old way is the way for now.

FWIW I like it in my code space too, I miss enough stuff now without hiding more info in INCs. So I guess it's the _config method for a while longer :-)
Martin