'DEFINE OSC 8' seems to be ignored by PBP ?


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mr.sneezy View Post
    So, anybody understand why the preferred Microchip config method gave me an error ?
    Like I was telling a friend of mine called ..." Skimask " ... ( coughing sounds around ??? Why ??? )

    "As a pilot, you know it works well and will not try to see if other ways could have been working ...

    may be it is just a very little thing ... but I want to have an in-deep look before telling anything ...

    BTW: do you have any link to this " new config way " ???

    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    96


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Acetronics View Post
    BTW: do you have any link to this " new config way " ???

    Alain
    Alain, I just read the detailed comments right out of the bottom of the 18F1220.INC out of my late installation of MPASM. It list's the config 'directives' for both methods, but says we should be using the new type syntax...

    Martin

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts