16/32 bits PIC support in PBP?

[comwarrior]

No.
Just curious. Is is the 16 million instructions per second that is too slow for your application, or did you need some DSP? Or is it the "more power!" (Tim Taylor) syndrome?

nope... faster analogue scanning, WAY more IO lines, WAY better math to play with bigger numbers! more communications 'ports'...

When you have a system running on a 18F4550 @48MHz with int clock and every AN/IO pin is used and the program barely keeps up, you know your not far off needing to upgrade...
i know it's just keeping up because the 'optional' code is the update to the LCD, everything else is interrupt driven...

Oh, and you can add more timers to the list... my code ATM has to share!

:edit
So, the question now is why doesn't PBP support > PIC18's?