after all ... PBP is not so bad ...


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 24 of 24

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653

    Default after all ... PBP is not so bad ...

    Hi,

    I never had the time to make compiler comparisons ...

    but, today a friend of mine leaded me to :

    the Goal : read a voltage and display it as a heading ( boat autopilot app. ) and use a 16F819

    Result is astonishing :

    Another Basiç compiler ... 2504 Words ... The ' 819 is unusable !!!
    its " PRO " version ..... 1722 Words ...

    PicBasicPro ... ahaaaaa ...461 Words.

    Of course I can prove the test is true and honest ...

    Some Comments, chaps ???

    Alain
    Last edited by Acetronics2; - 1st May 2010 at 09:41. Reason: PbP result is 461 Words ... 514 is 16F877A !!!
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    224


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Just curious about the hardware (16F819? LCD?), etc? Would like to compare it to my favorite C compiler and assembly language just for fun (grin)...

    Mike

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike, K8LH View Post
    Just curious about the hardware (16F819? LCD?), etc? Would like to compare it to my favorite C compiler and assembly language just for fun (grin)...

    Mike
    Hi, Mike

    Let's compare what can be compared ... won't you ???

    those BASIC tested compilers were proud to show on their site a totally subjective " side by side comparison " ... backdraw of Humour, eh !!!

    Now, i also use C ... and sometimes assembler ( under torture only ...) and know what can be obtained ...

    Note also THEIR C compilers @ 90% of examples need lots more room than my favourite PBP Compiler ... @ equal result.

    So, one seems to have to pay " whisles and bells " the price in bytes ... looks to be a question of compiler producer and not of language ...


    Were not here to re-start a Nth Compiler war ( really boring ...) ... but to tell ( and prove ! ) PBP works not so bad ... in the end !!!

    In the end ... you may choose the one you want, Mike ... nobody will criticize you.

    Alain
    Last edited by Acetronics2; - 1st May 2010 at 09:44.
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    224


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi Alain,

    I was genuinely interested in the application that you were trying to create. I apologize if it seemed I was embarking on a comparison war.

    Kind regards, Mike

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    USA, CA
    Posts
    271


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    What was the "other" compiler? I have PBP, but switched my primary compiler to Proton because I was running out of room on a project. It wouldn't fit with PBP, but it would with Proton. In fact, I saved about 20% with with switch... I had room for feature creep!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Cambridge - UK
    Posts
    1,046


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi,
    the Goal : read a voltage and display it as a heading ( boat autopilot app. ) and use a 16F819

    Result is astonishing :

    Another Basiç compiler ... 2504 Words ... The ' 819 is unusable !!!
    its " PRO " version ..... 1722 Words ...

    PicBasicPro ... ahaaaaa ...514 Words.

    Of course I can prove the test is true and honest ...
    Please publish your code example and name the compilers that you used. or your post leaves the reader to rely on innuendo and speculation.

    If your code example is valid and the compilers are genuine versions and have been used correctly, there is nothing to gain by not mentioning the names of the compilers that you tested.

    AS a moderator, you must make the effort to set a good example, when making a post on a subject that is obviously going to stor up some emotive discussion.

    Furter, if your comparisoons are valid, your post could easily become the core of an article in the WIKI or even an article in the catalogue section where we advertise and promote PBPro.

    Come on, you can do better, if the jobs worth doing, do it well. If you're going to promote PBPro in this way, lets see it done openly with transparency.

    Quote:
    Of course I can prove the test is true and honest ...
    Last edited by Acetronics2; - 1st May 2010 at 10:54. Reason: Lester's special request ....

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts