I quote skimask: It's the guy behind the keyboard, oh and what Darrel said tooOriginally Posted by mackrackit
|
I quote skimask: It's the guy behind the keyboard, oh and what Darrel said too
If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
.
Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
.
There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.
|
Darrel,
Could you do it with an 8 bit PIC?
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
|
Oh sure ....
But I'm a little busy right now trying to get Windows running on a 16F877A.
DT
|
Windows 3.1 or Vista
Last edited by mackrackit; - 13th March 2010 at 22:47.
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
|
I have done a PC monitor VGA with a 40MHz PIC in assembly but the pixels are actually a
block of pixels maybe 4x4 as the PIC cannot change the output any faster.
Haven't tried the newer faster PICS but would some day like to try FPGA's.
See dsPIC30/33 or PIC24 for a VGA display project?
Norm
|
160Mhz
On Linus' page Ioannis linked to.
He describes an out PORTC,register command that reads a variable and puts it out on the PORT in a single instruction cycle.
That would take a minimum of 2 instructions on a PIC.
Since the atmel doesn't divide FOSC/4, and takes half as long for some intructions.
The PIC would have to be running @ 160Mhz to get the same video response.
Last edited by Darrel Taylor; - 13th March 2010 at 23:02.
DT
Members who have read this thread : 0You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks