PBP, 16F1827, FSR, and Error 113


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Gilroy, CA
    Posts
    1,530


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    The 16f88 has a single FSR register. The PIC16F1827 has FSR0 and FSR1 registers.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    263


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scalerobotics View Post
    The 16f88 has a single FSR register. The PIC16F1827 has FSR0 and FSR1 registers.
    Yes, I see that in the 1827 manual.

    Where do I look to diagnose the cause of the message and solve the problem?
    Russ
    N0EVC, xWB6ONT, xWN6ONT

    "Easy to use" is easy to say.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    263


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Okay.

    As an experiment, I commented out everything having to do with the interrupts: Both "includes", the associated ASM block, and both the enable and disable commands ('@').

    It now compiles with no errors.

    It won't run, of course, because I need the INT_INT.

    Darrel, can you chime in on this one, please?
    Russ
    N0EVC, xWB6ONT, xWN6ONT

    "Easy to use" is easy to say.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Russ,

    Are you using DT_INTS-14 version 1.0?
    http://www.darreltaylor.com/DT_INTS-14/intro2.html

    File is at the bottom of the page.

    It was updated for the 16F1 chips, and adds many INT sources.
    <br>
    DT

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    263


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Red face

    Quote Originally Posted by Darrel Taylor View Post
    Are you using DT_INTS-14 version 1.0?
    DOH! My "favorites" link still brings up the old page. I did look . . . apparently not well enough.

    Thanks!
    Russ
    N0EVC, xWB6ONT, xWN6ONT

    "Easy to use" is easy to say.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Yeah ... sorry.

    I haven't updated the main page yet, because I've received ZERO feedback from the people that I know downloaded it.

    I could assume that means it worked for them, or they would have complained.
    But until I get some idea if there's problems, I don't want that to be the file everyone downloads their first time.

    Love to know how you get along with it.

    Thanks,
    DT

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    263


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    If my "blinky" is any indication, it works fine for INT_INT, which is the only one I'm using at the moment. I also tested it (INT_INT) in the full program, and it is working, both on the output and driving a "heartbeat" indicator at the same time. (It's a zero-crossing detector.)

    The rest of the program is problematic. As I mentioned, it worked on the 16F88, but only one channel works correctly on the 16F1827. I have to assume I have overlooked something in terms of managing and/or definining pins/ports, since each channel's code is identical.

    I may be yelling for help yet this evening.
    Russ
    N0EVC, xWB6ONT, xWN6ONT

    "Easy to use" is easy to say.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RussMartin View Post
    If my "blinky" is any indication, it works fine for INT_INT, ...
    That's a start.
    Thanks!

    I may be yelling for help yet this evening.
    OK.

    Don't forget ...

    ANSELA = 0
    ANSELB = 0

    <br>
    DT

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Gilroy, CA
    Posts
    1,530


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Thumbs up ver 1.00 of DT_INTS

    Quote Originally Posted by Darrel Taylor View Post
    I haven't updated the main page yet, because I've received ZERO feedback from the people that I know downloaded it.
    Darrel, your interrupt version 1.00 gets a thumbs up from me. I have only tried a few different types of interrupts with it, but it works great.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CROATIA
    Posts
    38


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: ver 1.00 of DT_INTS

    post deleted
    wrong treed
    i fond problem,
    my wrong file name save
    Last edited by ShoKre; - 13th January 2014 at 09:13.

Members who have read this thread : 2

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts