Picbasic Pro compiler 2.60 error


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    They are known issues with PBP 2.60.

    The EEPROM commands were modified considerably to allow WORDs and LONGs.
    A couple errors crept in, and they are supposed to be fixed in the next patch.

    Keep an eye on this page ...

    Known issues in PICBASIC PRO Compiler 2.60
    http://melabs.com/support/pbpissues.htm
    <br>
    DT

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,651


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi, Darrel

    I catch the thread in flight ...

    As you have somewhat modified the PbP files ( DT Goodies i.e. ...) there should be a little problem with patches ( ??? corrected wayyyyy before the patch comes, I suppose ....) and upgrades ...

    For us ... patch refuses to apply if files have been modified, so we get a brand new full installation !!!

    How do you proceed not to loose or forget the mods each time a new upgrade comes ???

    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,121


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    ehhmmm,... make notes in a notepad maybe???

    Yeah this is an issue that bothers me too. I got 2.50 but never replaced my old installation just because I am lazy to find which files I modified...

    Ioannis

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,651


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Ioannis View Post
    ehhmmm,... make notes in a notepad maybe???
    Hi, Ioannis

    May we suppose it's new year Humour ...

    ROFL

    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,121


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Alain, we need it don't we?

    If you think any way of mking updates less painful, do tell us.

    When Darrel wakes I am sure he would give an idea on this.

    After all I bet he has the most modified PBP directory!

    Ioannis

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    86


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Maybe instead of using the word "patch" I should have said "band-aid solution"

    the patch I was referring to would be in my files, not the compiler files. ie a
    Code:
    write 0,0
    at the end of the program that never gets called.

    David

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Acetronics
    For us ... patch refuses to apply if files have been modified, so we get a brand new full installation !!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Ioannis View Post
    When Darrel wakes I am sure he would give an idea on this.
    After all I bet he has the most modified PBP directory!
    Oh hello, I'm awake now. 10PM

    Actually, for each patch or version level, I create another whole installation from the CD, then apply the patch.
    That way I can test for people's problems related to the specific version/patches.

    Talk about a mess ...
    I've got 9 PBP folders. Each one with different levels of modification.
    I'm constantly commenting out config lines in .inc files.

    I guess, for anyone that only wants one installation, the procedure is the same. (Patch a clean installation)
    Just delete the old installation when you're finished. NOT

    But some day ... you'll want something that was in that folder.
    Some day will be 3-days after you delete it.

    How do you proceed not to loose or forget the mods each time a new upgrade comes ???
    I don't. I figure it out again when something doesn't work.
    Cause it may be for a different reason now.
    <br>
    DT

Similar Threads

  1. Experimenting with the PicBasic Pro Compiler
    By polymer52 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: - 17th May 2016, 19:17
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: - 17th May 2016, 19:03
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 20th December 2009, 12:57
  4. Optimizing DIV
    By skimask in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: - 22nd September 2008, 04:58
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 1st July 2008, 21:07

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts