Hi, Mel
Pretty good question ...
let's suppose the model must stay on a 1/10 scale winding road ...
... As it was in the Beatle's song ... a long and winding road.
Precision of a GPS can be enough for a plane ... but a model car ...
Alain
Hi, Mel
Pretty good question ...
let's suppose the model must stay on a 1/10 scale winding road ...
... As it was in the Beatle's song ... a long and winding road.
Precision of a GPS can be enough for a plane ... but a model car ...
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
You are right, you need a wide road for the RCAP as it is. And no, it is not autonomous, but it includes many of the items that Kenjones1935 is asking about, like an example of a connection to the receiver that allows either transmitter control, or switched to "autopilot" mode, where the pic controls the servo. But I would love to see more examples as well!
Here is 4 or so trecks down a the straight, wide (1/1 scale) roads. Another good place would be a soccer field.
![]()
Thank you all for your encouragement and suggestions.
My vision is a car that can be raced using the regular RC control on a circuit defined in the basketball court of the middle school gym but then the track leads underneath the fold down bleacher seats. The student running the RC can not see under the stands. Remember that under there on the floor are many supporting structures. The car must avoid these on its own.
A different vision is to have the same track on the gym floor, but including a maze made from, say, cardboard boxes that the car must navigate. We could put Xmas tree lights over each of the exit holes in the boxes. In autonomous mode the car could sense the lights.
RC cars have beautiful model suspensions. They go very fast and are quite indestructible. From the point of view of developing STEM thinking they are missing a formal language and repeatable controls. I are trying to marry the two.
Ken
Maybe just leave the RC part intact. Add another RC channel and another board.
The second board would be for auto.
The added RC channel would be to switch power from one board to the other.
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
Yes, this idea might work.
My problem is that I do not know the details of the I/O signals of the various parts of these 'bots. With LEGO RCX the outputs to the motors come directly from the encapsulated microcontroller system. The motors are not as powerful as those in a RC car. The commands available to the RCX from the ROBOlab program have seven levels of power.
The RC cars, on the other hand, are driven by a 7.2 volt battery pack through a box called a "speed control". Speed control gets its signal directly from the RC receiver. I think it is treated as a servo. Is this pulse width modulation?
I am hoping to borrow an oscilloscope soon.
Ken
This might help some.
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/e...hapter%205.pdf
and the suggestion up in post #2 also.
But yes, PWM is how speed is controlled. How your car is setup I do not know. Maybe if you gave a brand/type someone here might know off hand?
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
Still finding it difficult to find the I/O details of my radio control receiver and my electronic motor speed controller. What is on those three wires (white, red and black) between the receiver and the ESC?? Also what is the information format on the three wires (blue, red and black) between the receiver and the servo?
RC receiver: FUTABA FP-R122JE am 2 channel BEC
ESC: NOSRAM Tomahawk Reverse 93050
motor: MABUCHI RS-540RH/SH
Bookmarks